JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2003

POETRYETC 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: indiscriminate firing in NASSIRIYAH

From:

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:37:56 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

Look, we've been in the midst of a revolution in the US since 9/11. It
involves a rewriting of the most basic laws of economics, a trashing of the
environment, an assault on the rights of Americans, an elimination of the
rights of anyone else our govt decides, without judicial intervention, is a
threat. We've also engineered a melt-down of the norms of international
behavior that we'll all, here and abroad, be paying for well into the
future. It's hard to imagine how the US establishing Afghanistan and Iraq
as glorified military bases can fail to have disastrous consequences, from
driving enormous barriers between ourselves and Europe, not least because
we apparently plan to establish a US monopoly over the exploitation of the
wealth of the middle east, to destabilization of a region  in which there
are three atomic powers ruled by religious and nationalist fanatics and a
fourth on the way to developing atomic weapons. All of this justified by
our leadership's absolute faith that the world is a simple place in which
whatever we say must be the morally and tactically correct position.

It may be that this enormous role of the dice will play out ok, but the
odds aren't with us, not least because the rest of the world isn't likely
to roll over and play dead. If they don't the horrors perpetrated by Saddam
(and throw in Al Qaeda for good measure) will look like small potatoes.

Let's remember that our forces killed 3 million people in Vietnam, that we
backed the killing of several hundred thousand in Indonesia, and that the
destabilization that followed from our actions made Pol Pot possible. A
series of unintendeed consequences, precipitated by what many felt were the
best possible motives. This is not about whether George Bush is personally
as nasty as Saddam, it's about foreseeable consequences.

And here's a really nasty thought that I resent like hell being forced to
think. The less costly this victory the more likely we are to try it again.
The equation goes something like this: The less US blood is spilled this
time the more blood of others, by several factors, will be spilled in the
future. Because our feckless leaders will see war as cheap to fight, not to
speak of an easy boost in the voting booth.

Mark

At 12:06 AM 3/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Mark Weiss wrote:
> >
> > Only our guys are fully human. How could it be otherwise?  Hasn't it always
> > been so?
> >
> > In the fullness of time, as you develop something like compassion, you too
> > may become fully human.
> >
> >
>
>I don't quite understand for whom I am not showing compassion.  But
>you're right, in part - I feel no compassion whatever for Saddam Hussein
>or anyone who willingly serves him.  As opposed to those who fight
>because of fear of reprisal against their families.
>
>Lt. Col. Tim Collins, commander, 1st Battalion, Royal Irish Marines, 16
>Air Assault Brigade, to his men, 22 March: "The enemy should be in no
>doubt that we are his nemesis and that we are bringing about his
>rightful destruction.  There are many regional commanders who have
>stains on their souls and they are stoking the fires of hell for
>Saddam.  He and his forces will be destroyed by this coalition for what
>they have done. As they die they will know their deeds have brought them
>to this place. Show them no pity."
>
>The rest of his statement is equally moving.  You can find it.
>
>Yes, yes, I know, sentimental, self-righteous, partial, a half-truth.
>In these respects like so much that appears on this list, and hence a
>useful corrective.  And now I'll be silent.  Because I know from
>experience it will do no good to say I detest Bush and Ashcroft, that I
>regard them as being ALMOST as dangerous to civilization as the
>theologians of jihad.  It will do no good to argue that DESPITE the fact
>the US helped keep S.H. in power while he served its purposes, the fact
>that it's now deposing him MAY lead to a net gain in freedom for his
>people.  Against whose oppression people like us would certainly have
>signed petitions, but never physically fight.  It did no good for me to
>send that material about Sayyid Qutb - it inspired no serious, i.e.
>non-moralizing, questions about real forces in the world.  It inspired
>nothing whatever - it didn't fit.  Some of you have to see America as
>the greater enemy, no matter what it is opposing.  A mullah, a suicide
>bomber, the stoners and mutilators of women, "brilliant Osama," Saddam
>H. - they're human, they're sacred victims, they're no threat, they're
>fucking MATES compared to, say, an oil executive.
>
>I'll go back to lurking, now.  Sometimes there's useful stuff on poetry
>here.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager