> > To some extent this reopens the argument about tidy vs. untidy
> literals in
> > RDF.
>
> I hope not ;-)
You are not alone :)
[snip]
> The typed literal "en-IE"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#language>
> is just as globally unique an indentifier as a URI, and anywhere it
> occurs it denotes the very same resource (datatype value).
Then does this not make it "tidy"? It was my understanding that all literals
were going to be untidy.
If the answer is yes then the rest of my mail is irrelevant.
|