JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM Archives

HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM  November 2002

HERFORUM November 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: National Inventory of War Memorials and SMRs

From:

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Issues related to Sites & Monuments Records <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:25:28 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (182 lines)

Hi Martin

don't get me wrong, I wasn't aiming to criticise, the data wasn't aimed at SMR's and therefore we can't be surprised that the data structure is not one that would perhaps be chosen if it was.

I was merely pointing out that the use of Pre-1974 boundaries has implications for MIDAS compatibility (IE it should go in as an Historic Admin Area rather than current) and also on deciding on which data to send to whom.

I am sure the following (not exhaustive) list of SMR's (South Yorkshire; York, North Yorkshire, N York Moors, Yorkshire DAles;  West Yorkshire; et al) would not want to each have to trawl through the full list of Memorials for Yorkshire to figure out which are in their area. As part of the mapping to MIDAS, looking at the data in terms of how such an issue can be addressed would be useful as well.

best wishes


Nick Boldrini
SMR Computing Officer
Heritage Unit
North Yorkshire County Council
Direct Dial (01609) 532331

North Yorkshire County Council has the right 
and does inspect E-Government mails sent
from and to its computer system.

>>> [log in to unmask] 26/11/2002 15:02:19 >>>
>Whilst I don't wish to moan about this, as we would be happy to get the
data, this is something that Martin/DSU needs to
>bear in mind for this project, and possibly other projects of this type
(hopefully this is the first of many projects where
>national datasets are universally made available to SMR's.....)

I would just like to point out that neither myself or the DSU were involved
in the specification of the recording or the database. This was not an EH
project.

>Spinning off from this, the issue about the accuracy of the NGR's begs the
question of how the Inventory was compiled - was
>this desk based research or did it involve site visits of any sort?
Recording in the field was carried out by volunteers. To give some further
background I'll forward on Jane's paper to the HELPS e conference 'Unpicking
the Past", apologies to HELPS members who have seen the following before.

Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: Newman, Martin [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 05 November 2002 10:51
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: UK National Inventory of War Memorials

Welcome to the second day of the Organising Survey Projects Session of
Unpicking The Past. Today's conference paper is on the UK National Inventory
of War Memorials by Jane Furlong who is based at the Imperial War Museum.

Martin


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE UK NATIONAL INVENTORY OF WAR MEMORIALS
Jane Furlong, Imperial War Museum

Introduction
This paper is written as a follow up to the one presented by my colleague at
the Weaving the Tapestry conference in 1999. Since that time, the Inventory
has developed considerably and the role of both the staff managing the
Project and that of our volunteer fieldworkers has shifted in emphasis. This
paper aims to show how the project continues to evolve.

Background
To begin, I will first give a brief history of the Project. On Thursday 8
November 2001, the Imperial War Museum announced the launch of a new
database and archive, the UK National Inventory of War Memorials (UKNIWM).
UKNIWM, established in 1989, has been a ground-breaking and successful
partnership between major public institutions, a dedicated nationwide
network of volunteers and generous sponsors and is jointly administered by
the Imperial War Museum and English Heritage.

The Inventory as it stands today is the result of 13 years of hard work.
Overseen by a committee formed of representatives of organisations sharing
similar concerns about war memorials throughout this country, information
has been collected on all physical objects in the United Kingdom created or
installed to commemorate those killed in time of conflict or as a result of
military service. Volunteer fieldworkers were recruited from those
organisations on the committee as well as through appeals in the local press
and community magazines. These appeals have helped to generate a countrywide
team dedicated to locating, recording and researching war memorials
throughout the UK and as at 2002 we currently have over 450 fieldworkers
working in the field.

The Changing Face of the Inventory
However, since the launch the Inventory has been going through a process of
transition due to two main factors: the changing aims of the Inventory; a
new attitude towards volunteers in general within the Imperial War Museum
(IWM). I will look at each of these in turn.

The Inventory is currently evolving from a project which concentrates on
data collection and data input to one in which the consolidation of that
information gains increasing importance. This, coupled with the Inventory's
rapidly increasing public service requirements has meant that the role of
the volunteer in the field has become a less prominent part of our work.

Whilst we could never claim that the Inventory is complete, as memorials are
still be erected to this day and old ones are being rediscovered, the
Inventory now runs a huge risk of duplicating information that is collected
by our fieldworkers. Our system of local co-ordinators has helped alleviate
this but each one of our 450 fieldworkers are now chasing increasingly
smaller numbers of memorials which have not yet been recorded. Consequently,
the management of this team has at times become more of a hindrance than a
help as more time is being taken up with organisation of fieldwork rather
than the inputting of the data received and carrying out our public service
role. As the essential job of a volunteer is not only for them to have a
rewarding experience but for their work to have a positive benefit for the
project we have now come to the decision that we must reduce the number of
active volunteers to a core group within each county.

Fieldworkers' roles will essentially be the same as in the past. They will
be collecting information for the Inventory, but the type of information
they will be collecting will be of a different nature. We will still be
asking them to keep an eye out for any gaps in our survey and keep us up to
date on the condition of those memorials they have recorded. This latter job
is especially important if we are to maintain the founding spirit of helping
to protect and preserve memorials as quite a few of our records are over 10
years old.

However, we now need to plug the gap in the background history of the
memorials we have on our database. This will involve much trawling through
local archives, a less attractive job than doing site surveys judging by the
current lack of background information for many memorials. Whilst very time
consuming, this work needs fewer people to be able to do it  hence the need
to reduce the numbers.

The second impetus towards the change in the Inventory is the introduction
of a volunteers' working strategy at the IWM. This strategy was initiated
owing to the Museum's desire to recognise the considerable help that it
receives from volunteers and to provide a uniformly positive volunteering
experience in line with best practice and current legislation for those who
have become a volunteer at any of the museum's five branches. Before this
was initiated each branch had its own basic policy depending upon the number
and usage of volunteers.

Some branches are more reliant on volunteers than others, for example the
UKNIWM's large team in the field is unique for IWM London. Recognition of
their work was done on a informal basis, for example, whilst we at the
UKNIWM would arrange for free entry for our fieldworkers to any of the IWM
sites, this option was not available to those working at other sites.
However, whilst the policy is still in its planning stages, each department
who uses volunteer is now aware of the overall strategy and the fact that
each person is now treated on a equal basis no matter where they work. We
have realised for a while that quite few of our fieldworkers are no longer
active and, with the forthcoming greater accountability towards them, the
need to reassess our working relationship with them is paramount.

Conclusion
As with any survey project, there will come a time when the work is
essentially complete. The UKNIWM has now reached that point but it does not
mean to say that we are now going to discard our volunteers with a brief
thank you but goodbye. Each one of them has played a valuable part in
forming this unique archive but many of them have additional interests and
many are spending less time helping the Inventory. However, we need to know
this so that we can devote more time and resources to those who are working
for us. Those who stay will continue to be appreciated but those who wish to
move on are being encouraged to help Friends of War Memorials, a charity
established to help protect and preserve war memorials, who are looking for
fieldworkers to help them in their work. We will always have a need for
volunteers but change is now upon us and we hope to take this opportunity to
enable the work that has been done to reach a wider audience through access
on the internet and public access terminals within the various Museum sites.


WARNING

This E-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily the view of the Council.

North Yorkshire County Council.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The average family throws out six trees worth of paper a year - respect the environment and be green by example; only print out this email and/or attachments if you have to.

Thank You.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager