This is just to clarify that my recommendation against bringing over more overseas speakers is a budgetary concern only. If overseas speakers were willing to pay for themselves to come over, and if they had something to say that was of relevance to a UK audience, then they would of course be very welcome to speak at HEN seminars.
If HEN had unlimited resources I would of course love to pay for everyone to attend, irrespective of where they live. Unfortunately, however, I find myself living in the real world.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barbara Krimgold [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sun 11/24/2002 3:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc:
Subject: RE: Question
Philip,
Although Adam's recommends against bringing speakers from outside of the UK,
FYI there are two thoughtful experts on your topics in the US. First,
Marilyn Moon, a top expert on US Medicare over the past 20 years, also a
columnist on Medicare in the Washington Post and a public member of the
Social Security Commission. Second, Deborah Stone, a very original scholar
now at Dartmouth, who studied disability and whose latest research project
is on Care and Citizenship (what kind of care are citizens entitled to? and
what about the caregivers?) Equity is a
central theme in their work around citizens & medical/disability/long term
care.
Barbara Krimgold
Center for the Advancement of Health
US
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver,AJ
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: 11/24/02 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: Question
Deart Philip
Thanks for your suggestions (though personally I'm far from convinced
that more health care resources should go to the elderly, as the elderly
already consume the lion's share of available health care resources,
though your point may be more to do with use of, rather than amount of,
resources), and indeed to everyone else who has made suggestions for
seminars. I am, however, looking for more than just suggestions. I'm
looking for people who would basically be willing to organise the whole
seminar (i.e. pull a complete programme together, invite speakers and
discussants, give me a quote re. budget etc.). I'm willing to help out
in inviting speakers (so long as I am given names and contact details),
in publicising any event and collecting the list of attendees, and I can
probably book a room at the LSE if necessary. But, at least for a year
or so, I'm not willing to organise another HEN seminar in its entirety.
Some of you have given me reasonably detailed plans for seminars, and
there is at least one seminar that looks as though it will probably go
ahead. We'll make a decision re. seminars within the next week or so,
but if you would like to run a seminar could you give me: 1) its theme;
2) list of speakers/discussants/chairs and contact details - unless
there is very special circumstances, we can't bring anyone else from
overseas, due to expense; 3) estimated budget (a crucial piece of
information); 4) suggested date; 5) suggested number of attendees.
Thanks
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Dawson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sun 11/24/2002 9:35 AM
To: Oliver,AJ
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: Question
Dear Adam, Congratulations on such prudence!
I'm concerned that in my own general practice the group that is
most
disenfranchised by the health care system are the elderly
physically and
mentally infirm. They often have fixed ideas great difficulty
adapting
to change and are at risk of elder abuse often due to financial
exploitation. They are expected to use up their own resources to
fund
their health care.
The elderly are likely to represent a much bigger component of
our
health care system in the near [next 20y] future. Perhaps the
chance to
look at how they should be cared for and the current health
inequalities
in the care of the older person would be relevant.
One big issue for me is when does palliative care rather than
interventional care become the best and most economic option for
care.
Most of the time the health care professionals do not know the
answer,
if there is one.
Certainly with health care interventions the risks are
greater. I.e.
the intervention is slightly more likely to have disastrous
consequences, such as stroke or heart attack. However if the
intervention is successful, then quality of life is high and
conversely
demands on society for caring resources are much lower.
This shows up currently in health care circles by the term 'bed
blocker'. Is this a form of elder abuse by health
professionals? It
certainly represents a failure of appropriate use of resources
by the
caring professions. Maybe the expediency of the urgent, quasi
health
problems is outweighing the overall importance of society's
obligation
to care for our less able members, many of whom are elderly.
I heard the other day that cognitive performance in old age was
inversely related to your systolic blood pressure at the age of
50! It
maybe that the answer to some of these problems relies upon our
own
attitudes to our health care at present.
So may I suggest two separate seminars!!
1. What would be the value of long term investment in health
care? If
we know people are going to live for 80 years then surely our
health
care investment must be for at least that time or preferably
longer.
What are the national health care plans for that length of time?
2. Society's acquiescence to covert elder abuse. How can we
give policy
makers simple feedback about the conundrums of care of the
elderly in
today's society?
Thanks for running the seminars I have enjoyed them
Kind regards
Philip Dawson
-----Original Message-----
From: The Health Equity Network (HEN)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Oliver,AJ
Sent: 20 November 2002 20:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Question
Hello
As many of you know, I've been holding an ESRC seminars grant
for HEN
for the past couple of years. The grant was given for 6 seminars
up to
April 2003 - the last one of these six will take place in March
2003.
I was awarded £12,600 for all six seminars, but I'll underspend
by
several thousand pounds I think. The ESRC won't let us keep any
of the
money after the deadline, but they will allow me to run
additional
events within the deadline.
I don't know whether I've got the energy to pull another one of
these
things together completely under my own steam before March, but
if any
of you have ideas and would be willing to pull a programme
together for
a one day seminar that you'd find interesting (it must have an
health
equity-related theme), I'd be willing to consider it.
Let me know if you're interested.
Adam
|