Not so Larry,
We Douglas Adams devotees know that the magic number is 42, and let noone
say different!
rgds John
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: measure of level of impairment?
> But everyone knows that the magic number is seven as with samurai,
dwarves,
> stars, churches in asia and secrets of success
>
> The concept of impairment is essentially flawed because there are no
> objectives. To measure impaired you first have to define perfect, but how
do
> you proceed to define perfect ?
>
> Larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Sarah Supple
> > Sent: 25 November 2002 16:24
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: measure of level of impairment?
> >
> >
> > HI, does anyone know if there is a measure, about six items would
> > be perfect
> > that measures level of impairment. I am about to look at Quality of life
> > literature for this but thought you guys might know of one. Thanks,
Sarah
> > supple.
> >
> >
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|