Roland,
> ....the current xml-schema approach seems to prefer
> derivation by restriction -
>
> would like to know why
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#complexTfromSimpleT
>
> is not considered.
Just to clarify, do you mean when defining the complexTypes which
represent the encoding schemes please?
I think that in order to be used in the instance as values of xsi:type,
those types have to be derived from the default type for the element?
Pete
|