On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Wagner,Harry wrote:
> Pete,
>
> > I might be going wrong here, but (unless I am experiencing some effect
> > of cacheing somewhere) I don't think this _does_ get me the RDF schemas
> > which have been indexed by the registry.
>
> You are correct. The registry is based on RDF data, but not a particular
> schema. It's not ideal, but is better than loading schemas with known
> problems, and the data does represent the UB decisions.
>
> What is loaded in the registry is much closer to Roland's version (with a
> few additions, i.e., the new date qualifiers) than to what the namespaces
> resolve to.
Please, please, please... can we remove the incorrect RDF schemas that the
namespace URIs resolve to. Incorrect data is *worse* than no data - and
much more confusing.
It is totally crazy to have released
http://dublincore.org/usage/terms/dc/current-elements/
but to have left an incorrect schema at
http://purl.org/dc/terms/
A simple 'rm' should do the job - 2 minutes at most!
Andy
--
Distributed Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell +44 1225 383933
Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/
|