On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 11:31, Chris Croome wrote:
> I think it would be worth it. I also think that the mistakes in the
> other documents (s/dcterms:medium/dc:format/) should be corrected
> I suspect that (most) people using the documents on the DC site are
> generally unaware / not really bothered that they are 'draft
> documents' they will just be after some examples of good practice
> they can copy and build on -- that's why it's important to keep them
> correct and upto date, (IMHO).
It _is_ important to update. I was just about to write dcterms:medium in
an IEEE standard (LOM, what else?). It already has found its way into
IMS (http://imsproject.org/rdf) standards... but I guess this means a
chance to correct all that... :-) I'm grateful for this discussion, and
hope the errors will be corrected!