JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS Archives


ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS Archives

ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS Archives


ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS Home

ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS Home

ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS  May 2002

ECON-BUSINESS-EDUCATORS May 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: International Baccalaureate

From:

Chris Rodda <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

For teachers and lecturers interested in curriculum issues affecting the te <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 21 May 2002 13:46:54 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (45 lines)

I couldn't disagree with Martin more. The IB Economics programme has a 5
year rolling syllabus review that allows all teachers a say in the course.
Change happens, but it happens with advance warning of a couple of years and
a decent amount of information being exchanged - something that the A level
boards have not managed. Any student getting a 7 in Econs at IB would get an
A or B at A level and of course the syllabus is not as large A2 (although I
am beginning to wonder at that too as I now get to grips with Edexcel.)
`The students have 6 subjects to do, 150 hours of community service and
sport, a 4000 word extended essay, and a compulsory philosophy course and
accompanying exam. Rather the pattern of AS and A2 seems to be copying the
35 year old pattern of standards and highers laid down by the IB. it is just
not possible to put the Economics syllabus next to A level Economics for
judgement - the course is holistic. This is why it is utter madness of
admissions tutors to ask for say 7 6 6 in higher subjects for uni entry and
ignore the other 50% of the course entirely - like asking someone how their
reading is but ignoring their writing.

What IB Economics never had was endless requirements to learn about the
intricacies of the discount market, Anthony Barbers budgets and the workings
of the MPC - Thank God! The emphasis is on understanding the world. A level
students might be forgiven for not knowing that the world population is 5
billion for all the attention anything beyond Dover gets.

Anybody who has ever taught a class of IB standard level students who
invariably have selected Natural Sciences as highers knows what a joy these
classes are. I'd back them in debate against an A level group any day.

A greater than proportionate number of Economics students opt to do their
Extended Essay in Economics and the level of analysis and research done on
these would shame some degree dissertations. The higher level is and has for
many years been examined 80% by exam. With the addition of the compulsory
philosophy course (Theory of Knowledge) the IB student is provided with and
understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of
Economics and their other subjects. At A level there is a slight nod to this
at best and at worst a paragraph on the difference between positive and
normative.

Most of my returning students after a year at Uni point out that A level
peers have little idea how to go about original research, construct
bibliographies, references etc - something IB students take for granted.

After 10 years teaching it I may of course be a little one sided in this.
And one last not insignificant point the IB pays about examiners 3 times the
A level rate - and I suspect that has an effect on the quality of marking.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
December 2012
November 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
December 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager