paul i didn't see that .. sorry must have been at EH then ..?? or was that
your previous e-mail.
I would be very happy to help in any way and develop procedure of
adoption and implimentation of standards. It is already on both Ed's and
my mind and agenda with the termionologies we developed for Sources
& Archive and Protection/Grade Status.
sounds like a agend item for FISH
"Compliance building for implimentation of new standards"
>>> Paul Gilman AAG Manager ES <[log in to unmask]>
4/February/2002 02:32pm >>>
Ed Lee has asked:
"So there's a variety of ways to develop the list of Event Types lists - the
key thing is to ensure that they work together, adopt a common
and don't conflict in points of detail. If this sounds like a priority to be
tackled now, then can I suggest that this discussion transfers to the FISH
That is fine by me except I also asked recently whether SMRs were
in a mechanism to help them to implement these and other standards. So
there has been very little response to this - so can I have some reaction
This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
person unless express permission is given. If you are not a named
recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your
It is the recipient's responsibility to ensure that appropriate measures are
in place to check for software viruses.