And why are the European sociologists not prepared to censure the sacking on
the PCBS - this does not necessarily imply adopting a one-sided stance (as
if incidentally when the situation is clearly one-sided that is an untenable
position) - it implies demonstrating concern at a very specific piece of
I am sure our Palestinian colleagues can speak for themselves but I for one
hope that we shall hear more voices from colleagues in Europe and elsewhere
(Jewish, Christian and Muslim) supporting the idea of a protest by members
of ESA (if not the organisation itself). I am sure the late and much
lamented Pierre Bourdieu would have taken a clearer and stronger position.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Based upon the newsletter of the European Sociological Association
> (ESA). [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Benoit
> de l'Estoile
> Sent: 04 February 2002 15:14
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: ESA & PCBS
> Dear Colleagues,
> My impression is that the discussion has on the whole been helpful.
> I understand some of us are concerned that a formal protest by the
> ESA to the PCBS sacking might appear as a message of censure from
> the international scientific community towards the State of Israel,
> and as taking a one-sided stance in a complex and tragic conflict.
> In order to avoid this sort of misreading (which would on the top of
> it be politically inefficient, since this could be taken as just
> "another political condemnation of Israel as a State"), and to stick
> to our point as sociologists, I suggest it might be appropriate to
> formulate our protest together with Israeli and Palestinian social
> scientists (be it those who took part in the debate or others). In
> this way, it would clearly be a positive demonstration of solidarity
> with our colleagues, and, hopefully, a modest, but concrete
> contribution to understanding and peace.
> Best regards
> Meilleurs voeux pour 2002!
> Benoit de L'Estoile
> Departement de sciences sociales
> Ecole normale superieure
> 48 Bd Jourdan, 75014 Paris