JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CETIS-METADATA Archives


CETIS-METADATA Archives

CETIS-METADATA Archives


CETIS-METADATA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CETIS-METADATA Home

CETIS-METADATA Home

CETIS-METADATA  January 2002

CETIS-METADATA January 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: IMS Metadata Use Survey

From:

Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:17:04 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (117 lines)

Hi,

We are currently working on the evaluation phase of the EASEL project which uses
IMS MD, LOM and DCEd.
( I did not attend Loughborough meeting and I only hope that my comments are
relevant)

1) In relation with Lorna's sensible suggestion to expand the options
novice/expert. It occurs to me that 'prior experience in producing learning
material metadata'  using some other metadata standards could be also relevant.
Whoever has this experience would find IMS easier to use not to
mention that IMS is, for instance, only an application profile of IEEE LOM.
More importantly this kind of person would also be potential source of useful
information on the reason why one would choose IMS MD and not build own
application of IEEE LOM or DCEd.
It might look that addition in the novice/expert users question would overlap with
the question - but the point is essentially different.

2) 'Are you using any other metadata schemes, if so which'
- it looks like that here mentioned question would need some clarification whether
'metadata schemes' asked should not be 'learning material metadata schemes' only.
It is big difference in a profile of person who is using museum, library, archive
or other metadata schemes and those being involved with educational material only.

Having said that any experience in metadata could be also very relevant although
in a different way (better understanding of resource discovery requirements,
indexing policy, granularity, access points, character coding issues, information
exchange, vocabulary control etc.)
So suggestion would be
1) Are you using of have used any other metadata schema besides IMS MD?
a) yes, another educational metadata schema

        Which one(s)? ____________________________
b) yes, another non-educational metadata schema
        Which one(s)? ____________________________
c) no



3) Athough the following could be a part of some other survey - it would be
extremely usefull to harvest information on
- IMS metadata management issues (did on use a databases to populate IMS metadata,
what kind of database, how did they process data).
- size of the collection described
- search programes, techniques, interrogation sw using IMS MD
- planned or undertaken evaluation on metadata information retrieval performance


Aida Slavic
LITC
South Bank University
103 Borough Road
London SE1 0AA
tel: +44 (0)207 815 7845
fax: +44 (0)207 815 7050


Lorna M Campbell wrote:

> Hi Phil,
>
> I had a read through the summary document you sent and my only immediate
> comment relates to the "level of expertise with IMS MD" question.  At the
> moment the two options are novice & expert.  As you rightly pointed out it's a
> bit of a stark choice and I'm not sure I know many people who would be brave
> enough to claim to be expert in using IMS MD!  I would suggest asking
> respondents to choose form a list of statements along the lines of:
>
> I have no prior knowledge of IMS MD
> I am aware of IMS MD
> I am familiar with IMS MD
> I have attempted to implement IMS MD
> I have successfully implemented IMS MD
>
> You could also invite respondents to comment on their choice.
>
> Just a suggestion!
>
> Bye for now
> Lorna
>
> Phil Barker wrote:
>
> > Hello CETIS Metadata Interest Group,
> > I hope you all had a good break.  One piece of work which I didn't
> > quite manage to get out to you before the holidays was the summary of
> > our discussions about a survey of who is using IMS metadata, why, and
> > how. Here it is now.
> >
> > Any comments would be welcome. In particular:
> > -Have I forgotten/misinterpreted anything from he discussions
> > -Can anyone think of anything else we should ask about
> >
> > Bets wishes,  Phil.
> >
> > --
> > Phil Barker                            Learning Technology Advisor
> >      ICBL, Department of Computing and Electrical Engineering
> >      Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
> >      Tel: 0131 451 3278    Fax: 0131 451 3327
> >      Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
> >
> >   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                          Name: IMS_use_survey.rtf
> >    IMS_use_survey.rtf    Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> >                      Encoding: base64
>
> --
> Lorna M. Campbell
> Research Fellow
> Centre for Academic Practice
> University of Strathclyde
> 0141 548 3072
> [log in to unmask]

--

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
November 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
February 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
April 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager