JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FISH Archives


FISH Archives

FISH Archives


FISH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FISH Home

FISH Home

FISH  2002

FISH 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Events/Consultations

From:

"Newman, Martin" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH)

Date:

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:49:43 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (79 lines)

Nick,

In my opinion consultations of the SMR need to be recorded but are not
events. Full DBAs however should be treated as events. If a planning enquiry
comes in to the SMR it is important to know if a DBA has previously been
carried out on the site, by who, when etc. This may avoid latter duplication
of effort. The best way to do this is by recording them in the same way as
excavations, surveys etc which are seen as events. Any DBA reports should
also be recorded as a source. This fits in well with the monument event
archive model. The existence of a monument(s) results in a DBA (the event)
via the planning process which is published (probably as grey literature as
a source (the archive).

Hope this helps.

Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Boldrini [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 14:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FISH] Events/Consultations


Hello folks and apologies for cross posting

Here in North Yorkshire we have just migrated to HBSMR and are working on a
data standard for inputting backlog/new data to try and get some
standardisation in inputting set up.

One of the discussions we have has had is essentially when does an event
become an event? Slightly abstract, but it needs to be agreed to make sure
we (IE all NY SMR users) are all recording the same things

For example, a contractor comes in and looks at the SMR for a DBA. Would
people record this as an event (DBA) or consultation (SMR Visit) and only
record the Event when you receive a report?

The issue driving this is that often, we only here about certain types of
work in this way (an SMR visit by a contractor) for example non-dc pipeline
schemes. SO we would like to record something as having happened so we can
(in due course) try and chase up a copy of a report, but as we are unsure if
or what work has happened, it is difficult to know how to record this.

DO other people worry about this? Do other people record these sort of
things? If so how? I can think of a variety of ways to record this in HBSMR,
but am curious to know how, or if, other people do this.

thanks in advance

PS I had marmite and peanut butter sarnies for lunch - YUM!

Nick Boldrini
SMR Computing Officer
Heritage Unit
North Yorkshire County Council
Direct Dial (01609) 532331

North Yorkshire County Council has the right
and does inspect E-Government mails sent
from and to its computer system.



      WARNING

This E-mail and any attachments may contain information
that is confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for
the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken is prohibited and may be
unlawful.

Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not
necessarily the view of the Council.

North Yorkshire County Council.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
December 2023
September 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
February 2016
January 2016
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
October 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager