JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS  2002

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Afghanistan and Palestine

From:

Karl Carlile <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Karl Carlile <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:03:31 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (68 lines)

"This has worked for the United States so far, but it is not working for
Israel, its Middle East ally. Israel cannot bomb the Palestinians from
the sky and rely on collaborators to clean up the mess. No organised
Palestinian political force is ready to do that. The Palestinian people
are fighting the occupation desperately. The Israelis have, therefore,
to confine themselves to attacks by Apache helicopter (how ironic that
this weapon should be named after one of colonial America's first
victims), assassinations carried out from a distance, shelling of
civilian areas, and beating up teenagers at roadblocks."

The reason there existed forces in Afghanistan that were prepared to do
Washington's dirty work of attacking the Taliban is because of the
extraordinary nature of the struggle in Afghanistan. In Afghanistan much
of the forces engaged in civil war have no real social roots within the
masses. The fighting is conducted over and above and even against the
wishes of the masses. This because it is in the nature of warlordism to
mobilise armed forces independently of the people. Warlords don't see it
as their concern to win over support from the masses. They are
indifferent to the plight of the masses. It is as if they exist in a
different universe to the masses. The Taliban regime was of a similar
nature. It made no serious attempt to sink its roots into the masses. It
made decisions with no regard as to how the masses felt about them. They
too demonstrated a cold indifference to the condition of the masses. Bin
Laden's force were all the more like this because the majority of his
force were from outside Afghanistan -mainly Arabs. Indeed they may have
even viewed themselves as superior to the Afghan masses. The Taliban and
the Bin Laden force have paid for their indifference and even hostility
towars the populace. When they were under attack from imperialism there
was little or no support or sympathy to be found among the Afghan
people. It was this absence of any real social base that rendered it
easier for Washington's forces to make headway. It is this absence of
social roots within  the masses that offers an explanation as to why
their were forces within even Kandahar province and city prepared to
join the US in the attack on the Taliban and Bin Laden.

In many ways Afghanistan is a sharp contrast to the Middle East. Here
there is an absence at present of any Palestinian forces prepared to
join up with Israel to mount an attack on Hamas and Islamic Jihad. This
is
because these organisations have a social base that forms a platform for
the conduct of their struggle. The former, certainly, has painstakingly
built up a social base among the Palestinian masses. The PA and Arafat's
Al Fatah  has also secured a social base within the Palestinian masses.
Consequently these organisations conduct their struggle with an eye to
the response of the masses. They are not free to conduct the struggle
independently of the masses. However it does not follow that this
situation may not change.  Politically impoverished as the actions or
politics of these Palestinian elements may be they still preserve a
relationship to the masses. It is this that lends the Palestinian
struggle a different quality to the struggle in Afghanistan. Washington
is very sensitive to this distinction which is partly why  relates to
the Palestinian issue in a different way.

The Taliban and the UBL organisation are extremely reactionary forces.
UBL has shown, as I understand it,  little or no interest in the plight
of the Palestinian masses. This helps explain why Arafat was so prompt
to attack UBL when, in one of his recently broadcast videos, he called
for solidarity for the Palestinian cause. It was, it would seem, a
blatant example of an opportunist attempt to exploit the Palestinian
issue to save his neck. It has been said that the Taliban or the UBL
group have received support from Israel. It is this that may shed light
as to why, in the past, UBL never seemed to show much interest in the
Palestinian struggle.
Regards
Karl Carlile (Communist Global Group)
Be free to join our communism mailing list
at http://homepage.eircom.net/~kampf/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager