JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2002

POETRYETC 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: RANT

From:

Mairead Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 23 May 2002 22:32:47 -0500

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (156 lines)

Jesus Patrick.  If you look at it another way, how many Americans had to
pay one quarter of one cent in  order for you to *breathe* sufficiently
long to write this message?  Twenty?  Thirty?  Maybe you had a
mouthful of coke or whatever when you were writing it?  Fifty?  Sixty?
Well, this puts a whole new slant on democracy and representation.
The constituency of the artist, simply by virtue of paltry subsidy, is
*huge*.  I suppose there's a definite danger of saying: hey, your subsidy
is so rotten this syllable is all you get.  On the other hand, a good
haiku now: how many quarter of a cent would that take?  Looking at it
like this, one imagines the artist spearheading vast cohorts of widows'
mites rather than yowling in the living room.  I think your post requires
and fully deserves the quarter of one cents of several hundred Americans
and that you serve them well.
Mairead


On Thu, 23 May 2002, Patrick Herron wrote:

> My rant on being nice to Americans -
>
> Yes, this is a rant.  Forgive me if it offends anyone.
>
> As an American, specifically as a native Philadelphian, I think Lawrence is
> right on.  He did not mean to slander us, or, at least, not all of us.
> There are some of us here in America, perhaps only a wee few, who know about
> the sort of people Lawrence is talking about.  America is full of people
> "talkin' 'bout freedom, speakin' 'bout liberty," people who are in reality
> nothing but slaves to a bunch of criminals.  Besides, I was the first one
> who put forth the "Philadelphia hypothesis."  I'm talking about MY family at
> risk.
>
> Nothing would surprise me...my US government is run by irrepressible
> hegemons and criminals.  Between Cheney, Bush, (what a pair, Dick and Bush,
> won't pull out 'till they've gone all the way) and Condosleeza Rice you've
> got millions dead in Iraq and Timor, before they ever came to office.  In
> Central Africa.  Brown & Root, Halliburton, Chevron, Unocal, Enron, the
> Carlysle Group (chaired now by John Major, working with fellow scum like
> James Baker and Frank Carlucci).  As Governor of Texas, Bush tried to give
> Lockheed Martin exclusive control over the state welfare system before
> Clinton stopped him.  Lynne Cheney, Dick's wife, is on the payroll at
> Lockheed Martin.  Lockheed Martin alone receives over $12 billion annually
> from the US Federal Government for defense contracts.  And 9-11 looks very
> sketchy--stand-down orders from the 113th fighter wing over DC during the
> attacks, evidence of cover-up, a trail of documentation showing that the
> Bush administration was warned at the very least but continued to act
> completely surprised afterwards ("was it the terrorists," Bush said, not
> "was it some terrorists" or "were they terrorists"), and the "trifecta"
> comments by George Bush.  "Cui bono?"  Bush answered that question himself,
> not on network television, but at GOP fundraisers.  "I hit the trifecta."
> Scum.  His kingdom for a hearse.
>
> Lawrence's sarcasm is absolutely warranted.  I see quite clearly his point,
> once I got past my own irrational emotional attachments.  Our politicians
> here in America speak so frequently in the name of freedom (e.g., Bush's
> speech on Cuba this week) yet work against that very idea with every ounce
> of energy they posess (e.g., attack Afghanistan without rational
> justification, or, steal an election).
>
> If this hurts my fellow Americans, well, tough.  Their lack of pain in
> avoiding this painful subject is the reason we're all suffering from this
> crap here in America--the fading civil liberties, the extreme exploitation
> of the tax base for military/corporate interests, the looting of all social
> support systems, the destruction of public education, the explosion of the
> prison industry and the so-called "international war against drugs," the
> institutionalized military-corporate propaganda system built into the media,
> the suffocating forces all of these things exert on the arts and creativity
> in general.  Is that enough?  What about people in SUVs gouging themselves
> and the environment in the name of credit, kids running around with guns
> shooting each other?   The trickle down of these ugly economics empties out
> into the ocean of childhood, and we're training these kids and arming them
> so that they can come to your town soon!  Jawohl.  Maybe they'll be called
> the "Tee Shirts."  And I haven't even really touched on the international
> exploitation....allende and letelier, che, patrice lumumba and the belgian
> congo airlift, maquiladora industries and mercury in the streets, genocide
> in rwanda and zaire, 20 years of civil war in angola, arming both extremist
> palestinians and extremist Israelis, Plan Colombia.
>
> International TT International Tief
>
> One of the latest developments here is a new push for gun reform...folks in
> the Bush administration want to still permit individuals to possess guns and
> buy guns, but prevent anyone in an organized militia group from possessing
> arms.  Of course, this is the exact opposite idea that the founding fathers
> wrote into the Constitution, the right to bear arms in order to form a
> militia for defense from tyrrany and exploitation, not the right to keep a
> handgun under the pillow.  But gun sales matter more than public safety or
> preventing the government from direct acts of tyrrany.
>
> In June, 2000, it was announced that Secretary of Commerce William Daley was
> resigning his post to become AL GORE'S campaign manager. A few days later,
> it was announced that PRESIDENT CLINTON had named NORMAN MINETA his choice
> for the new Secretary of Commerce.
>
> Before being named Secretary of Commerce, NORMAN MINETA - a former
> California congressman - was an EXECUTIVE and LOBBYIST for LOCKHEED MARTIN!
> In January, 2001, President GEORGE W. BUSH (R) named NORMAN MINETA (D) as
> his SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION.
>
> On September 11, 2001, under the watch of NORMAN MINETA, four U.S. airliners
> were hijacked.
>
> On October 27, 2001, LOCKHEED MARTIN was awarded the largest military
> contract in the history of our country.  $200 billion.
>
> Cui bono?
>
> Just one of many many factors.
>
> America is now responsible for over 40% of the world's annual military
> spending.  40%!  The American people are sleeping through this and just
> opening their pockets wide to these fuckers who sit around trying to figure
> out how to increase those numbers.  And the American people bitch about the
> 1/4th of 1 cent they each spend on the arts.  If that hurts Americans then
> let's hurt us some more.  We're literally a loaded weapon.  As a country
> quite clearly we're dangerous.  If we don't hurt and change, everyone else
> will continue to get hurt.
>
>
>
> Best,
> Patrick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and
> poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Wild Honey Press
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:09 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: POETRYETC Digest - 21 May 2002 to 22 May 2002 (#2002-143)
>
>
> I know this was said out of compassion for others, but I don't think any of
> us appreciate how hurtful remarks like these are to Americans.
>
> Randolph
>
>
>
> From: "Lawrence Upton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Nuking Philadelphia. What an idea for the loving Bush bros!
> >
> > Mind you, freedom loving democrats bombed Jugoslav Vojvod and everything
> was
> > beautiful in Kosovo - I guess it works the way a needle in your foot may
> > cure your headache...
> >
> > Or a pain anywhere else
> >
> > I'd like to think the people of Philadelphia would make the sacrifice if
> it
> > would help a great nation towards healing and hope
> >
> > Dream well
> >
> > L
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager