JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2002

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Digest - 7 Jan 2002 to 8 Jan 2002 (#2002-5)

From:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/

Date:

Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:51:04 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

Patricks piece on net art and financial models was thorough and clear. I am
trying to think if there is anything to add to what he wrote.

He mentioned the idea of public art and how net based practice can
interface to that model both conceptually and financially. This is true.
Most of my practice over the past 20 years has been non-object based and
nearly always temporary in nature and the bulk of what I have done which
has actually turned a profit has been public work, either outdoors or for
specific indoor sites. In all of these cases the work was commissioned and
the money was thus not a fee but rather the costs of producing the work,
employing collaborators, assistants, specialists, etc and then those costs
associated with putting it up. The artist then takes a percentage of all
that. This is also a little like the performance model Patrick hinted
at...in that theatre producers often work this way, putting together a
patchwork of funding for something that only exists once the funding is in
place.

The trouble I found with this model was that to make it worthwhile you
needed to do large, and often ever-larger, projects that maximise the
resources and numbers of people involved. The bigger the project, the more
high profile, the more likely the funders will support it, the more money
involved and thus the bigger the slice of the cake for the artist (and
everybody else).

This might all sound fine...but there is a downside. Working like that
tends to be very inflexible. Projects get bigger and bigger and with more
money the artist has more responsiblity...until it gets to the point where
they start to lose control of the work...the accountants and project
managers you find yourself employing to make all the bits fit take over and
you become a cog in the process of your own work. Not pleasant.

One of the reasons I started to work more with the net was to find a way
out of this model whilst still remaining close to what I like doing best
(working with interactive and behavioural systems). But then we are back to
being broke. So, then you start to do commissioned net based "public"
works. Then we are in danger of being swamped again.

Perhaps I (we?) just don't like the responsibility that comes when you have
money (and peoples expectations) coming into your projects?

best



Simon Biggs

[log in to unmask]
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
The Great Wall of China @ http://www.greatwall.org.uk/
Babel @ http://www.babel.uk.net/

Research Professor (Digital Media)
Art and Design Research Centre
School of Cultural Studies
Sheffield Hallam University
Sheffield, UK
http://www.shu.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager