JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2002

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Digest - 9 Feb 2002 to 10 Feb 2002 (#2002-22)

From:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/

Date:

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:18:46 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

Josephine wrote:

>Ah! Pots and kettles! Glad to see you are so objective! Will you stop
>labeling me as if I were thinking more hierarchically then anybody else
>too? Dear me.
-----
OK, let's try to be friends then ;)

>1 - it is beyond doubt that curators are as important or probably more
>important as critics in the way art is perceived. Can they make a
>difference as to how it is valuated (economically) as well?
-----
I think that there are at least a couple of exemplary curators (some of
whom are on this list) who clearly represent just this, although whether
they have made any economic difference is a good question. Possibly, in
that they have focused attention on an artist who has then been
commissioned for something else, for example. Whatever, there are curators
who do seem to place equal value on media art and to also promote it
through writing as well as curating. They are few and far between
though...although increasing in number.

>2 - There are on line and off line exhibitions. Do curators take more
>liberties (with both the artists and the artworks) when they arrange an
>on line exhibition then when they organize physical exhibitions? If yes,
>why?
-----
My personal experience is that liberties are taken, as a recent thread on
this list evidenced. Still no resolution to that...

>3 - When dealing with net art (but also other electronic art and new
>media art) do curators realize at all there is a history and context? If
>yes, should they take this context into account at all? Are catalogues
>giving enough insight into the works presented?
-----
I would have assumed that an important part of a curators job is not only
to contextualise artwork into existing artworld discourse but to also
research the context that the work emerges from and address that in public
in an attempt to present the work as a living thing, emerging from a real
context, whether that be the street (as in grafitti art) or a media art
sub-culture. The value in this, at the very least, is in how the process
can effect the dominant discourses of the artworld. However, it would seem
that many works are appropriated by institutions with curators implicated
in this. By appropriated I mean that the work is torn away from its context
and repackaged to facilitate another agenda. This happens all the time in
all walks of life and it is corrupt and corrupting. I would never work with
a curator or an institution if I knew they were doing this. I would also
seek to expose what they were doing. Problem is that it might be that all
institutions, and thus their curators, do this just by doing what they
do...that they cannot help themselves, or if they can it is something they
have to address proactively on a constant and ongoing basis - a bit like
dealing with the subtleties of institutional racism, for instance.

An example of this can be seen in how most ethnographic museums exhibit art
from prehistory or from non-Western cultures. Some are good and seek to
show the work in a well researched and documented manner that brings the
context of the work to life...but most do not, placing much of the work
into a linear narrative founded on Western values. In the process they
render the work inaccessable on its own terms, corrupting the work and its
viewers.

So, yes...curators should be obliged to deal with the background and
origins of work, regardless of where it comes from. Sadly, unlike dealing
with something like institutional racism, there isn't anybody "out there"
to oblige "them".

best

Simon




Simon Biggs

[log in to unmask]
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
The Great Wall of China @ http://www.greatwall.org.uk/
Babel @ http://www.babel.uk.net/

Research Professor (Digital Media)
Art and Design Research Centre
School of Cultural Studies
Sheffield Hallam University
Sheffield, UK
http://www.shu.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager