JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2002

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

curating critically

From:

Josephine Bosma <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/

Date:

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 12:10:21 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (101 lines)

dear list,


Simon Biggs wrote:

> Josephine's attempt to distinguish between the net and
> computing is valuable in potentially illuminating some of those pursuant
> issues, although I feel that any heirarchical value she seeks to place upon
> them can only be subjective and of relevance only within a Dietzian TAN.

Ah! Pots and kettles! Glad to see you are so objective! Will you stop
labeling me as if I were thinking more hierarchically then anybody else
too? Dear me.
:)

I hope we can slowly start talking about curators and their critical
role maybe.

There are a few points that are interesting to me:

1 - it is beyond doubt that curators are as important or probably more
important as critics in the way art is perceived. Can they make a
difference as to how it is valuated (economically) as well?

2 - There are on line and off line exhibitions. Do curators take more
liberties (with both the artists and the artworks) when they arrange an
on line exhibition then when they organize physical exhibitions? If yes,
why?

3 - When dealing with net art (but also other electronic art and new
media art) do curators realize at all there is a history and context? If
yes, should they take this context into account at all? Are catalogues
giving enough insight into the works presented?

4 - What do curators find more problematic about new media art:
interactivity or ephemerality? Does the answer to this depend solely on
whether a curator creates a permanent collection or a temporary
exhibition? Are there any curators out there who think new media art
should be left to its own domains (the public domain for example)
completely?

Writing these questions down I realise that there is no such thing as
The Curator.

Some background to the questions:
1 - I have trouble understanding the lower value of 'immaterial' (of
course there often is some kind of material residue) work in the Art
System (for want of a better term). How influenced or dependent are art
institutions and curators by/from the art market? How influenced and
dependent are their sponsors and funding sources by/from the artmarket?
Could curators raise more financial support/reward for 'immaterial'
art?

2 - What I find very strange is that some large media festivals (in
Europe) think they do not even have to inform the artist if their work
is in their exhibition and catalogue (or even press releases). This is
really not uncommon! It seems even that ('traditional') art institutions
are doing a better job then their media counterpart there.
On the other hand there is a general tendency to treat media artists as
if they were immaterial themselves. They often do not get invited to
openings or physical openings are not organised (there are not many on
line openings (in chat or so) either) and they seem to get less
attention of the pr department in general. I think we are really missing
an opportunity when media art gets seperated from the real (flesh)
world.

3 - I ask this because especially in the case of net art it seems as if
curators sometimes want to recreate history. It makes a difference
whether you commission a famous media artist (usually a video or
'multimedia' artist) to make a net art work for your site or whether you
choose an existing or commissioned work by an artist that is used to
working with the net. The difference is that the first is very likely to
reinvent the wheel: he or she will often make work that is really not
that interesting when you consider net art as a whole. Maybe, to compare
it to the music industry, it is like creating pre-fab number one hit
groups with genuine musicians. Therefore it will not be taken seriously
on line and/or the exhibition is a laughing stock in that context.
Context matters. If your audience does not know anything about this
context you can teach/show it to them with a good catalogue (with
articles about the work and other relevant texts).
I guess this matter is closely related to the issue that many art
institutions do not realise the potential and responsibility they have
gained when entering the media realm 'real time' (until today art and
popular media did not engage with eachother much besides the almost
bureaucratic press releases from one to the other). The web and the net
are not just a collection of journals and magazines, they have some
qualities of tv and radio combined with the personal space of the
telephone. The cultural space has changed, and art institutions are part
of it. Art institutions and curators should realise what power politics
they become/became part of.

4 - No comments here, just questions for the time being.

Well, I could go on changing details to this mail, but what matters is
the discussion that comes out of it. Looking forward.



J
*

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager