JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2002

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Digest - 8 Jan 2002 to 9 Jan 2002 (#2002-6)

From:

Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/

Date:

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:16:17 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

Hi all,

Responding to Malcolm's and Mike Stubbs's mails:

It was good to hear Malcolm's thoughts as an institutional curator and that
he considers the museum to have a moral obligation to the artist and the
work (if not necessarily a financial one - as has already been mentioned,
the finance side of things will always be dependent on the specifics of a
situation). However, as he also pointed out, it is unlikely that the museum
has any legal obligation...meaning that whilst it might be embarrasing for
an organisation to appropriate an artists work without notification it will
not carry any greater penalty than that. Although I do not want to be
critical of Christiane here (who has posted on this subject honestly and
openly) I think it is of note that whilst she (I think she is a she?)
apologised for using Murph's work without permission she is not obliged to
do anything more than that...and the apology is forthcoming only because
she chose to apologise (she didn't have to)...which was thoughtful.
Nevertheless, the Whitney has no compulsion upon it to do anything...it is
only the standards set by the individuals and the institution itself that
in anyway conditions their behaviour.

Mike Stubbs's post primarily dealt with the financial side of things.
Whilst this is important I think the money issue is only part of a larger
issue, which is to do with rights and control of the work. When an artist
sells an object based work they usually also sign away their rights to have
control over its exhibition or distribution. If a collector wants to lend
the work to an exhibition, or whatever, there is little the artist can do.
However, what about when the artist has not sold their work? Do they not
still retain these rights of control? If somebody was to take an object
based artwork and show it in a space somewhere without the artists consent
would that not be seen as material theft (eg: they have had to physically
take something that belongs to somebody else and put it somewhere else
without permission)?

So, in the case of non-object based art (like the net or video) does this
argument also apply, and if so then if the artist has not signed away any
rights can people legally show or deploy that work without permission? In
the case of video (and Mike will know more about this than I, I'm sure) if
a TV channel broadcast a tape without permission wouldn't they be legally
culpable? I think they would. But what about net based art? As somebody
said, once a work is online it can be said to be in the public domain, and
as I understand it this shifts the legal context quite a lot. So, isn't the
question really to do with what rights, if any, the artist can retain when
their work is seen to be in the public domian but unsold (eg: as the artist
has not sold the work then they still own it...even though they have
allowed free and uncontrolled public access to the work)?

Sorry if my logic seems a little convoluted...it is not such a clear issue,
I think you will agree, and I am trying to think through to a position
where we can argue a case one way or another. Here it seems to concern
general notions of ownership and its attendant rights when things are in
the public domain.

Are there any copyright lawyers on the list?

best

Simon




Simon Biggs

[log in to unmask]
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
The Great Wall of China @ http://www.greatwall.org.uk/
Babel @ http://www.babel.uk.net/

Research Professor (Digital Media)
Art and Design Research Centre
School of Cultural Studies
Sheffield Hallam University
Sheffield, UK
http://www.shu.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager