Hazel,
Oxford is using MARC as required by the latest version of Geac. Potentially
quite good for display, but we and Geac still haven't got it right in the
web version of our OPAC, and creating/editing records to display optimally
is quite demanding (in Geac Advance, at any rate). Haven't any experience
of ISBD.
Matthew Searle
Collection Services Librarian
Radcliffe Science Library
University of Oxford
e-mail: [log in to unmask] phone: 01865 272819
http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/rsl/
> I'm trying to investigate a viable standard for holdings statements for
> serials. Could I ask members of the list to let me know what their
> preference is - particularly for *display* purposes - ISBD or MARC? I'm also
> interested in statements for computation.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Hazel
>
>
> Dr Hazel Woodward
> University Librarian & Director of Cranfield University Press,
> Cranfield University,
> Cranfield,
> Bedfordshire MK43 0AL
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: +44 (0) 1234 754446
> Fax: +44 (0) 1234 752391
>
>
|