JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  2002

ENVIROETHICS 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Disturbing problem with genetic engineered corn (though if applicable to humans it may solve some overpopulation problems.)

From:

Gus diZerega <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion forum for environmental ethics.

Date:

Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:41:22 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (186 lines)

I just received the following email which I think will interest many on this
list.  If applicable to humans it may solve some overpopulation problems...
;-)

Gus diZerega
____________

From: Chris Desser

The notice of this emerging problem just appeared in the Iowa Farm Bureau
newsletter.
Note: critics of genetically engineered corn have focused on allergenicity
not something like pseudopregnancies.

______

>Bt Corn Linked to Hog Breeding Problems

>

>Submitted by Jim Riddle

>Rt. 3 Box 162C

>Winona, MN 55987

>

>May 20, 2002

>

>In its April 29, 2002, edition, the Iowa Farm Bureau Spokesman

>contained an alarming story on sow breeding problems related to the

>feeding of genetically engineered Bt corn.

>

>According to the article, Shelby County, Iowa, farmer Jerry Rosman was

>alarmed when farrowing rates in his sow herd plummeted nearly 80

>percent. Rosman, who has nearly 30 years of farrowing experience,

>checked and double-checked all of the usual suspect causes. He tested

>for diseases, verified his artificial insemination methods were being

>properly implemented, and poured over his nutritional program. But he

>found nothing out of the ordinary.

>

>Eventually, Rosman became aware of four other producers within a

>15-mile radius of his farm whose herds had nearly identical

>pseudopregnancies. The herds had different management styles, different

>breeding methods and different swine genetics.

>

>A common denominator, Rosman says, is that all of the operations fed

>their herds the same Bt corn hybrids.

>

>Laboratory tests revealed their corn contained high levels of Fusarium

>mold. Rosman says researchers typed the Fusarium down to four strains,

>and two of them (Fusarium subglutinans and Fusarium

>monlliforme) were consistent in all of the producers' samples.

>

>One of the producers subsequently switched back to regular non-Bt corn,

>and pseudopregnancy is no longer a problem within that herd.

>

>Rosman believes the problem manifested itself on his farm because he

>planted 100 percent of the same brand of genetically engineered Bt seed

>corn and fed 100 percent of that corn to his livestock.

>

>According to the article, Rosman isn't sure whether or not he'll be

>planting any corn on his land this year. An agronomist has told him

>that a regular rotation of corn and soybeans might not get rid of

>whatever gene has contaminated his corn ground.

>

>In a follow up article on May 13, 2002, the Iowa Farm Bureau Spokesman

>reported that shortly after the story detailing Rosman's situation

>appeared, he was flooded with phone calls. "It hadn't even hit the

>mailboxes and the phone started ringing," Rosman says.

>

>By late last week he had received calls from 12 other producers from

>various parts of the state detailing situations very much like his own.

>The calls primarily came from smaller producers who, like Rosman, feed

>their own corn and noticed a sharp decline in farrowing rates recently.

>

>The Rosman article sparked the interest of Norm Smith, who farms east

>of Winterset, Iowa. Smith says he started experiencing breeding

>problems within a few weeks of feeding the new corn hybrids he planted

>for the first time last spring.

>

>"I started feeding Bt corn in late September, and within 30 days I

>wasn't getting anything bred," Smith said, adding that his brother

>encountered similar problems.

>

>The Spokesman articles illustrate the fact that genetically engineered

>crops have been rushed to market without proper testing. There have

>been no mandatory tests on the long term effects of these crops on

>livestock or human health. For example, the EPA, which regulates Bt

>corn, requires no tests to determine how the crop impacts the

>reproductive systems of the animals that eat it.

>

>Genetically engineered materials, such as products manufactured from Bt

>corn, are now commonly found in conventional foods. Due to a political

>decision made in 1992 by the Bush/Quayle administration, genetically

>engineered foods are not required to be segregated or labeled. Anyone

>who eats foods containing conventional corn, soy, canola, and/or

>cottonseed products is an unwitting guinea pig in a vast, uncharted

>ecological experiment.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Chris Desser

Funders Working Group on Emerging Technologies

2151 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94115

415-561-2627

[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager