JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  November 2001

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM November 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Malaysia: New law will make community mapping illegal

From:

Nick Blomley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nick Blomley <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:23:02 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (99 lines)

This was passed my way.  Apparently, there is a relationship between maps
and power!

Nick Blomley
**************

New law will make community mapping illegal
By Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Friends of the Earth,
Malaysia).
Press Statement
2001-10-31 | A new bill to be introduced in the Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN)
today, the 31st of October, will have a devastating impact on the ability
of native people to defend their Native Customary Rights (NCR). At first
glance, the bill (Land Surveyors Bill 2001) appears to be a reasonable set
of rules regulating the surveying profession. It creates a Land Surveyors
Board to regulate the activities of land surveyors. But because of the
wording of the bill, many community initiatives can be declared illegal.
A new bill to be introduced in the Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) today, the
31st of October, will have a devastating impact on the ability of native
people to defend their Native Customary Rights (NCR). At first glance, the
bill (Land Surveyors Bill 2001) appears to be a reasonable set of rules
regulating the surveying profession. It creates a Land Surveyors Board to
regulate the activities of land surveyors. But because of the wording of
the bill, many community initiatives can be declared illegal.
Community map making has been an increasingly important tool for the
indigenous communities in Sarawak. For people struggling to prove their
land rights, the making of a map has been a necessary step in getting the
boundaries of their lands recognized. In Sarawak, numerous NGO's have
assisted communities in making maps of their village boundaries. These maps
have then been used as evidence in court cases, as a resource management
tool, and many other purposes. Earlier this year, the Rumah Nor case was a
huge success for the recognition of NCR lands, and maps made by NGO's and
the people of Rumah Nor were vital evidence in that victory.
Now, all of this work is threatened by this shocking new bill.
According to the bill, only licensed surveyors can make most types of maps,
and anyone else who makes a map would be breaking the law. Most
importantly, any maps that show "the delimitation of the boundaries of any
land, including State land and any land lawfully held under native
customary rights" can be done only by a licensed surveyor. For years,
community activists have made dozens of maps in Sarawak showing community
boundaries, using mapping teams well trained in GPS (global positioning
systems) and GIS (geographic information systems) technology. Now, if any
such mapper "certifies as to the accuracy of any cadastral land survey or
signs or initials any survey plan", they "shall be guilty of an offense and
shall, on conviction, be liable to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand
Ringgit or to imprisonment not exceeding three years or to both for each
offense".
Unfortunately, these mappers working with communities cannot simply become
licensed surveyors. Under this new law, the Board of Land Surveyors has
complete power to decide who is certified and who is not. Community mappers
do not possess the necessary professional degrees that will be recognised
by the Board of Surveyors. Even those with all the necessary university
degrees and experience can be turned away without explanation by the Board.
They can furthermore revoke anyone's license at any time. It appears the
board will be controlled by the Department of Land and Survey (the Chairman
will be the Director of Lands and Surveys, the Deputy Chairman will be the
Assistant Director, and so on), so there is little opportunity to influence
the board's composition.
This law is truly without precedent, both in Malaysia and around the world.
Peninsular Malaysia for instance has a Board of Land Surveyors, but there
are no provisions there to restrict community mapping. Activists around the
world are using mapping as a tool without any legal restraint.
Why is the government of Sarawak the only government to criminalize
community mapping? Clearly these provisions are a reaction to the Rumah Nor
legal victory, and are an attempt to defeat the right of indigenous people
to prove their community boundaries. Numerous recent cases show that the
Sarawak courts are willing to legally recognize maps made by communities
and NGO's, But this new law would usurp the functions of the judiciary by
not allowing the courts to make a decision over the admissibility of
mapping or survey evidence conducted by community efforts, as done in the
Rumah Nor case and other cases. Now only this new Board would have the
power to determine which maps are legally valid.
The Department of Land and Survey has mapped only a very small percent of
NCR boundaries until now, and if they start on a major effort to do so, it
will take decades to complete. Even then, these maps will have little
validity if government surveyors don't consult with communities about their
boundary lines. The government also knows that most communities cannot
afford to pay a licensed surveyor to map their boundaries, if in fact
surveyors will be willing to risk taking on such jobs at all in the wake of
this ruling. Community mappers has served a vital roles neglected by
government surveyors. Without any map to indicate the extent of their
lands, communities will be increasingly powerless to oppose the claims of
logging, oil palm and other companies on their lands.
Around the world, indigenous land rights are increasingly recognized. Even
in Sarawak the courts have been increasingly progressive on these issues.
Only the Sarawak State Government is moving in the opposite direction.
Under the guise of a procedural surveying law, the government is adopting a
very regressive policy to suit their own vested interests, and denying
indigenous people their rightful claims. This law will be another black
mark in the treatment of indigenous peoples by the Sarawak State Government.
If the purpose of this bill is to prevent the making of fraudulent maps by
unqualified personnel, we agree with that aim. But there is no reason for
such a law to make the struggle for land rights into a crime. Sahabat Alam
Malaysia calls for the following sections to be struck from this bill:
- Section 20 (Approval of cadastral land surveys);
- Section 23 (Illegal practice)
If the government is sincere in respecting indigenous land rights, it needs
to make these amendments immediately

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager