Tod,
Please see my comments below.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tod Matola [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:34 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [POLL] What is at the end of the namespace?
>
>
> On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 08:58, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> > >
> > > Will RDFS include links to the XHTML (HTML) prose or do
> we do that by
> > > word of mouth (e.g., elements 1.1 spec lives at
> http://dc.org/blah and
> > > some of it's markup is at http://purl.org/dc/blah or
> > > http://abc.org/foo1.1).
> > > Isn't nice to be able to describe the relationships of
> the how these
> > > interact in a cononical location? Relationships are just
> as important
> > > and hard to markup (hence the bloody state of RDDL).
> > >
> > > Cheers Tod...
> > >
> >
> > Dear Tod,
> >
> > RDF (and RDFS) talk about "mark up" for semantic
> relationships. I don't quite
> > understand, what's your problem.
> >
> > Maybe you want some refined properties taken from third
> party maintained
> > RDF Schemas?
> >
> > In case we do, we have to consider semantic relations with
> dc properties themselves (for instance with dc:relation
> > refinements).
> >
> > It's easy to create new properties (and classes) - it's
> more the issue to integrate with existing ones - or?
> >
> >
> > rs
>
>
> I guess I was refering to the relationships of
> http://dublincore.org/2001/08/14/dces#
> and
> http://dublincore.org/2001/08/14/dces_deDE
> http://dublincore.org/2001/08/14/dces_esSP
> ...(20+ languages we hope right?).
> which one is canonical?
The language translations you listed above exist only to support the
prototype. There is only one RDF schema for the base element set. There
are however, 20+ translations of the label, definition and comment tags in
this schema. The language translations can, and (in my opinion) should be,
done without keeping additional copies of the schema. I am against using
RDDL because I do not think we can keep multiple versions of the schema in
sync. I especially do not think we can keep 20+ versions in sync. Better
to have one connical version and generate other versions (i.e. human
readable) from it.
Regards,
Harry
>
>
> and what about something like (I know that has not been considered by
> DCMI so you do not need to tell me it is incomplete
> experiment. I'm just
> hoping for a day when several flavors could co-exist and help serveral
> tool sets).
> http://www.doctypes.org/meta/DTD/xhtml-dcmes-1.mod
>
> Second when I do click
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
>
> why do I have to know how to read XML/RDF? I cut and pasted it in my
> browser (why not be kind and give a friendly reminder that maybe you
> should look at http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ instead (or in a
> language that I am more comfortable with
> http://dublincore.org/resources/translations/#dces1-1))
>
>
> Other namespaces use HTML to solve this
> Chris's example:
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
>
> DCMI used to...
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/
>
>
> Cheers Tod...
>
|