Hi Eric,
Thanks. I'd missed the rdfs:range. I've added that to the registry
prototype.
Regards,
Harry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Miller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Temporal Encoding Schemes
>
>
> At 11:36 AM 9/26/2001 -0400, Wagner,Harry wrote:
> >Stu,
> >Would you please cross-post this to dc-usage. Thanks...
> >
> >I just noticed that DCMI Period and W3C-DTF are defined in
> the qualifiers
> >schema (http://purl.org/dc/terms/) as a refinement of
> DateScheme, and in the
> >human-readable version
> (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmes-qualifiers/)
> >they are both defined as an encoding scheme for the Temporal
> refinement of
> >Coverage. Which is correct?
>
> These encoding schemes were defined to be useful for both by the Usage
> Board. Hence the additional rdfs:range assertions defined in the (now)
> /terms Schema.
>
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date">
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/terms/DateScheme" />
> </rdf:Description>
> ...
>
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/terms/temporal">
> ...
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/terms/DateScheme" />
> ...
> </rdf:Property>
>
> the following however might be more useful:
> http://potlach.org:8000/view?subject=http%3a//purl.org/dc/term
s/DateScheme
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead mailto:[log in to unmask]
w3c world wide web consortium tel:1.614.763.1100
200 technology square, ne43-350 fax:1.208.330.5213
cambridge, ma 02139 usa
|