The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  June 2001

DISABILITY-RESEARCH June 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Blunkett should ban the BNP/NF march!

From:

"Smith, Glenn" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Smith, Glenn

Date:

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:55:03 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (111 lines)

Several things in Paul Reynolds e-mail I would like to comment on...

I think that the line is far less clear than you paint it in your e-mail -
sorry to bring in the more compliated argument - but it really is.

The prejudice that many disabled people have met in their life comes from
those who do not shout about it. Most hate of, and discrimination of,
disabled people has come from 'respectable' quarters of society' not
fascists. You give them too much credibility, especially by banning them.
The other point about some prejudices not being worked out is meaningless.
So, some people are aware of their prejudices more than others and some
vocalise it more than others. So what ? The person at the other end still
feels it. Since a great deal of prejudice of disabled people came from the
medical and psychological disciplines, then these seem to me to be pretty
well worked out, and for a long time hard to reach.

I also think you are patronising to those people who voted BNP, because some
people agitated them to do so, they follow like working class sheep, unaware
of the fascists underneath the BNP skin. I think (I guess here myself) but
these people voted more for their feelings of exclusion as english working
class people in a northern town that has changed so quickly in character.
What you don't address is why some people feel like this and then become
violent about it. These things don't go away because you ban them. I'm
sorry, but whether the asian or black community has felt excluded for years,
this kind of argument takes us no futher. And unlike other countries in
Europe, historically, fascism has never been much of a threat in british
politics for various historical and cultural reasons.

The Black communties do not always live under seige. Sorry, you have to live
in them and experience them - like St Pauls or Toxteth in Liverpool where I
come from, to know that this is politcal identity hype, that alienates
communities even more. In London's Stratford, racism from black to asian is
sometimes spoken about.  Yes, there is racism, on many different levels, and
cultural differences, but, lets not go down the road of believing that
historical cause should excuse a tit for tat mentallity and hostility in the
present. That's like disabled people blaming all able-bodied becuase of an
able-bodied legacy that may exclude us. Of course, history matters, but were
talking about different generations, different contexts and classes. We
should be working with history to get away from these negative dualisms and
'eye for an eye' mentality.

I'm sure that many black people do feel threatened etc, and understandbly
so. I often feel threatened on some white council estates. But, I'm sorry
the reality in St Pauls in Bristol is one where the drug dealers are black
and the police do not touch them. My point was this: the police aren't
always so down on other cultural ways of behaving, like gathering in large
groups, playing music really loud. This is the opposite of what was said
about asian protestors being prevented from going into the city-centre of
Oldham by the police. If my example is a stereotype then, I'm sorry that it
fits into this - you can ignore it if you want, but the point is that the
experience of race etc is not just one huge big negative experience at the
hand of police and the state, that can feed this bitterness between races.
And how do you deal with these differences in culture/ ways of living anyway
?

But, if you live in St Pauls the drug pushing is done by young black men.
And if you live there and you are white and come from a more traditional
english background that doesn't like twenty blokes playing loud music in the
front of your house, smoking ganja and getting stoned, then, heh, lets quote
a bit of history and culture to justify their behavoiour, while making other
peoples social cultural lives miserable, because they have an imperialist
heritage ! As for the dynamics of what causes this in Bristol, they are
simple, yes, simple. These guys come over from Jamaica, register as a
student and then sell drugs. Historical legacies, poverty in Jamaica and
culture have no excuse for causing this vocal anti social behaviour to those
people who have to live with it. You can qoute your imperialist, cultural,
historical reasons, but it is cold comfort when your having to deal with
this, not as a social scientist, but as a householder. It is so easy to fall
into academic arguments about contextualisation, the dynamics etc, when you
are not having to put up with this kind of stuff on the door step. I do so
myself, as a social scientist, but I feel you cannot write about this kind
of stuff without touching base with why people voted in Oldham for the BNP,
you will never address the racial problems in this country.

I answered the previous e-mails because I believe that banning racist groups
does nothing in the present day to address these issues in the long term,
unless you understand and address, however unsavoury the thought, those who
feel the need to go down this extreme political avenue of thought.

I also think that these arguments about how cultural/religous/national
beliefs and values are assimilated, both socially and geographically, goes
to the heart of identity debates - especially in disability studies.  Do
other people, for example, feel that the Hindu belief of karma and
disability is fine ? Should we ban this 'belief system' because it suggests
we deserve to be impaired for are bad deeds in the past - that we are in
some way cursed ? Or should we live alongside it, knowing that this is a
different way of thinking about disability, or argue for change. Where do we
indeed draw the line ?

All the best,
Glenn.


________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager