Thanks for the reply Malcom, we do realise that tnhe locations of sites may
be uncertain in many cases, however the NGR gives us a ref. point. I've seen
a few of the sites so have an idea of size. We are recording as an area
centred on their NGR until we know otherwise. In the cases I've seen it will
probably be best to mark whole fields.
From: Malcolm Watkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 05 April 2001 13:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Foot-and-mouth -Reply
As the fires are burning in the field two away from my house, incinerating
sheep that I ahve untangled from our fence and nearby brambles, I feel a
certain personal involvement in this process. The trench which was dug to
burn our neighbour's stock took several days to excavate using more than one
machine. The animals were slaughtered on Thursday I think, and the burning
began on Tuesday night, by which time the dead animals were an obvious and
unwelcome addition to the normal countryside smells. My point is that the
trench for what I hope is just one farm's stock is very big, and an
eight-figure reference is probably wildly optimistic.
IMHO the locations should be recorded on SMRs or their equivalent, because
they are both positive archaeology (modern) and negative archaeology
(ancient) unless they happen to coincide with some massive early ditch or
river course, or similar.
I also think that archaeologists ought to have been involved in the
observation of the digging, but I doubt whether many others would agree.
> From: David Evans[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To: British archaeology discussion list
> Sent: 05 April 2001 14:14
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Foot-and-mouth -Reply
> So far all (4) request have come fro the EA but from 3 different people.
> Initially we got a 6 fig grid reference now 8
> One was last Friday when I was in the NMR (therefore uncontactable?) and
> no one else could find the data!!.
> knowing the approximate area of disposal we are probably getting them all,
> so far.
> Currently there is no coverage at weekends or over Easter
> Are we to receive details of the exact locations of the pits, at present I
> record each request as an open circle on a map layer.
> >>> [log in to unmask] 5/April/2001 01:10pm >>>
> Hello All
> This is a question for all Countryside Advisors, SMR staff, and DC people
> who are recieving FMD disposal site consultations. Could you please let me
> know whether your consults are coming from a single source or multiple
> sources, ie. from EA, EA/MAFF etc.? How consistent are the sources of
> consultations? How accurate is the info you're getting, point/area etc.?Do
> you think you are being consulted on all sites? Finally, what arrangements
> or requirements are in place for out of hours consultations, ie. weekends,
> Would appreciate replies before weekend if possible.
> Thankyou, replies on or off list.
> Nick Russell
> Countryside Archaeological Advisor
> Gloucestershire County Council Archaeology Service
> [log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Carter [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 26 March 2001 19:09
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Foot-and-mouth
> To quote from this month's issue of "Historic Environment Today", the
> newsletter of Herefordshire Archaeology:
> "Other earthworks thought in the past to be elements of a prehistoric
> system have been re-interpreted thanks to information provided by the
> Bircher Common graziers. These features mark the position, ironically, of
> mass burial pit for the victims of the 1967-8 foot and mouth outbreak".
> So confusion can set it after only 30 years. It does indeed make you
> ritual significance will be attached to these obviously high status sites
> years to come!
> Dave Carter.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Karl Wittwer <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:35 PM
> Subject: Foot-and-mouth
> > Without wishing to trivialise a serious situation for the farming
> > It has been announced that carcases of slaughtered sheep are to be
> > a 'mass grave'. If no records survive, I cannot help wondering what the
> > archaeologists of the future will make of it?
> "This e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and intended
> for the addressee only.
> If you are not the named addressee you must not disclose, copy or take any
> action in reliance of this transmission and you should notify us as soon
> as possible.
> This e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free from viruses but
> it is your responsibility to carry out all necessary virus checks and
> Gloucestershire County Council accepts no liability in connection
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it from South
> Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error
> please notify the South Gloucestershire Council postmaster
> at the address below.
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has
> been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
> [log in to unmask]
"This e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the named addressee you must not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance of this transmission and you should notify us as soon as possible.
This e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free from viruses but it is your responsibility to carry out all necessary virus checks and Gloucestershire County Council accepts no liability in connection therewith."