JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITARCH Archives


BRITARCH Archives

BRITARCH Archives


BRITARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITARCH Home

BRITARCH Home

BRITARCH  April 2001

BRITARCH April 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: FW: IFA AMNESTY -Reply

From:

Andy Russel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

British archaeology discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 00:02:21 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

I found the IFA thread depressingly familiar. The discussion began with the
usual 'What has the IFA done for us', followed on to 'Its done nothing for
me (but I'm not a member)', to 'I'm not joining because its too expensive'.
We then air 'the IFA trys to stop me getting a job because I'm not a
member', re-visit 'why don't the IFA discipline sub-standard archaeologists'
and we finally arrive at the anecdotal 'the worst archaeologists are not in
it, and what are the IFA going to do about them!'.

One of the purposes of the IFA is to set standards and to the promote them,
not to check that the work in Worsetshire is up to standard.   Curators can
demand that contracting archaeologists adhere to those standards. Of course
curators can send back reports that are sub-standard, but they need to act
before then. Curators should monitor the archaeologists at work on PPG16
sites, complain to the IFA if members of  IFA carry out substandard work,
and copy the correspondence to the client. (At this point curators say 'If I
monitored every site in Worsetshire then I'd have no time to check all those
planning applications.)

On pay and conditions the IFA (unfortunately I believe) has in its rules
that it should not act as a Trade Union. They do however monitor job
adverts, and any organisation paying less than IFA rates will be contacted,
and probably named and shamed in the quarterly journal. I'm embarrased to
admit that I speak from personal experience here.  Principle 5 of the Code
of Conduct says IFA archaeologists should respect the rights of their
employees to training and development.

The IFA has produced a large number of Technical Papers where you will find
experts in their fields passing on specialist knowledge on for instance
Human Remains or Remote sensing.

The subsidised training courses stand out as incredible value for money,
enabling members of the profession to keep up to date with the latest
developments in pottery or lithics or project management.

The local groups provide a venue for archaeologists to get together,
socialise, decide on a research agenda for the archaeology of their area,
and go down the pub for a good moan about...( the IFA probably).

The special interest groups, such as the one on Finds, are drawing up
standards for finds processing and reporting that might address some of the
points raised elswhere on britarch.

On subscriptions there have been some wild figures flying about. The sub is
linked to salary. The sub for a Local Authority Scale 2 digger is 51, less
than a fiver a month. You would only need to attend one subsidised training
course to get your money back. If you spend time unemployed the lowest band
is 12 a year. Specialist staff or site supervisors would pay say 2 a week.

To all those people who say they cannot afford it: perhaps if you did join
the IFA employers would take your applications more seriously, as coming
from someone who agrees to abide by recognised professional standards, and
perhaps your employment and pay prospects would improve.

To those who say the IFA should do something about the poor standards in the
profession: for IFA members the mechanisms are there, it is up to people to
complain about it to the IFA. I have taken part in disciplinary
investigations, and they grind slowly but thoroughly. The poor standards
outside the IFA membership? Curators could advise clients to use IFA
members, or ask all contractors, not just IFA ones, to abide by the IFA
Standards (it's done in at least one local Authority). But then someone
complained that the IFA trys to stop them getting employment! You cannot
have it both ways!

To those who refuse to join any organisation that would have them, fair
enough, but there will always be clients and employers who might not contact
you because they looked in the IFA yearbook to find a professional
archaeologist who subscribed to a recognised code of conduct and was a
member of a professional body.

IFA member 293.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager