> From [log in to unmask] Thu Mar 29 06:35 MET 2001
> User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509
> Mime-version: 1.0
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:35:24 -0600
> From: Aaron Swartz <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Action: please review XML Schema part 2: Datatypes
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know, but the Dublin Core and many others use DCES in RDF (as I
> showed) and you are ruining the meaning of what they said. Here is the exact
> example:
>
> <q cite="http://dublincore.org/documents/2000/11/dcmes-xml/index.shtml.rdf">
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> xmlns:dc ="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> xmlns:dcq ="http://purl.org/dc/qualifiers/1.0/">
>
> <rdf:Description
> rdf:about="http://dublincore.org/documents/2000/11/dcmes-xml/">
>
> ...
> <dc:creator>Dave Beckett</dc:creator>
> <dc:creator>Eric Miller</dc:creator>
> <dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
> ...
> </q>
>
> This is most certainly RDF, and it most certainly repeating that element.
I've reconsidered this point! I will change the wording, so that no "invalidation" could arise from it (hopefully).
Cheers
rs
>
> >>> 2.3.1 Poor Man's Structured Values
> >> This is an interesting name, and probably not an altogether correct use of
> >> rdf:value.
> > why? Here we pick up from the previous datamodel draft. (As we do at many
> > other places. Hope that this
> > is clear from the acknowledgements.)
>
> Sorry. My mistake.
>
> --
> [ Aaron Swartz | [log in to unmask] | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
>
|