JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MAPPING-CYBERSPACE Archives


MAPPING-CYBERSPACE Archives

MAPPING-CYBERSPACE Archives


MAPPING-CYBERSPACE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MAPPING-CYBERSPACE Home

MAPPING-CYBERSPACE Home

MAPPING-CYBERSPACE  March 2001

MAPPING-CYBERSPACE March 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: web censorship

From:

"George B. Tselentis" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

George B. Tselentis

Date:

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:05:44 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (249 lines)

Mr. Thomas;

I want you to know how bad I feel about this, but soemtimes words alone
cannot express to another human how they feel.

I worked for 5 years in IT while working for a City Government, in that time
frame I learned that what is "right" or "wrong" is not as important as
"whom" is in power and how does it affect their retirement. Currently I am
working as a "contractor" for a State Govt, and tell folks, I am lucky...I
get to leave at the end of the contract....you have to stay and suffer. I
will never work in government again as a result of those experiences.

I am afraid that you have suffered one of the lessons that all "public
officials" have suffered from the time of the Caesars, that of "political
consideration". Anywhere else, someone would have pulled you on the side and
discussed a "re-alignment of the goals"

The best of luck to you!
George B. Tselentis


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussing ways of mapping and visualising Internet infrastructure
and Web space [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Jeremy J. Shapiro
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 2:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fwd: web censorship


To: pol-sci-tech <[log in to unmask]>
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: web censorship
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:54:48 -0800
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
X-Topica-Loop: 700000438
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>

A good reason to archive websites!
++++++++++++++++++++

Check out the LA times story as well:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/20010315/t000022700.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi All,

Well, I have been fired for posting to the internet a single web page
with some maps showing the distribution of caribou calving areas in
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

My entire website http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/geotech/ has now
been removed from the internet.  This represents about 3 years
worth of work and 20,000 plus maps showing bird, mammal and
amphibian distributions, satellite imagery, landcover and vegetation
maps for countries and protected areas all around of the globe.  As
far as I aware it was one of the biggest collections of maps online
and certainly the biggest collection showing maps of biodiversity
and the environment.  The website was often visited by over a
thousand visitors each week.  In addition, I was fulfilling roughly a
dozen requests for geospatial data and information from
colleagues, other researchers and the general public each day.

All of this comes as a rather big surprise to me.  I was given no
chance to remove the webpage or even finish writing an appeal
before my position was terminated.  I was working under a contract
so I believe I have very little legal recourse.  I have received no
written explanation (or even an email) stating the exact reasons for
the termination decision and I understand that even though this
would be a reasonable courtesy to expect, it is unlikely to be
forthcoming.

>From my viewpoint my dismissal was a high-level political decision
to set an example to other Federal scientists.  I base this belief on
the following information I received from a colleague in Alaska who
is a leading researcher on the issues involved:

"I really hope you don't get fired.  In fact, had the timing of what you
did not been so inappropriate based on everything else that was
going on, I doubt that anyone would have noticed.  Your work
showed a lot of initiative..."

"...the fallout would not have been so great had the subject matter
not been one of the three USDOI super hot topics with the new
administration and had we not been briefing the Secretary at the
nearly exact time your website went up.  Everyone is nervous and
as I mentioned earlier, consistency in presentation is paramount."

So now, I believe my only recourse is to appeal to the general
public in the hope that in the future what just happened to me will
not happen to others.

I would recommend anybody in a similar circumstances to contact
the fine people at Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (http://www.peer.org) or a similar organization.

The response and support I have received from friends online has
been truely amazing.  I very much appreciate how quickly people
have acted on my behalf and helped publicize my plight and I
especially wish to thank the international mapping
community...receiving letters of support from far away places
cheers me up no end.  Please feel free to forward this email to
other lists and media contacts!  I would also be grateful if anybody
who misses all the maps I put on the internet please contact the
USGS to let them know and to ask that the maps be reposted.

I feel very bad that these events are also affecting my colleagues at
Patuxent.  Patuxent was a great place to work, has amazing
researchers and everybody I worked with is very supportive.

Many, many thanks for your support,

Ian Thomas
[log in to unmask]


The Details:

Nobody instructed/authorized me to post the web pages on Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge.  It was done on my own initiative.  I was
working on land cover maps for all National Wildlife Refuges using
the new National Landcover Datasets.  Last week I published over
1000 land cover maps online covering every National Wildlife
Refuge and National Park in the lower 48. (These maps have now
been removed from the internet too).  Similar land cover data for
Alaska were not available but the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
had a good landcover map so I included it.

In the past, I helped produce the only set of maps online showing
all bird species distributions in Alaska.  In addition I have produced
online mammal distribution atlases of Africa, maps for tigers in asia
and I was working on digitizing North American mammal range
maps produced by the Smithsonian Institution.

I have also been conducting background research to prepare
proposals to study the effects of mineral extraction on biodiversity
and protected areas on a very large scale.  One such proposal that
I was preparing would have looked at exporting analysis and
mapping methods applied in the United States to other regions of
the World such as Africa.  The proposal was co-sponsored by the
Mineral Division of USGS and the World Resources Institute.

The migration of caribou in North America is the closest thing that
we have to the great mammal migrations that occur in Africa.
African protected areas are also under great pressure from possible
development for mineral extraction.  So the carribou distributions
that I found on the Fish and Wildlife Service public website were of
particular interest.  I have also worked for several years on maps of
migratory bird distribution patterns. I therefore have a great interest
in other migratory animals as many of the temporal mapping
problems are similar.

I was completely unaware that there was anything wrong with
publishing ANWR maps. I have never been informed of any agency
restrictions or any other guidelines on publishing maps depicting
ANWR...I only now have been informed that there is a two week old
agency "communications directive" that limits who is allowed to
distribute new information on ANWR within my agency.

I thought that I was helping further public and scientific
understanding and debate of the issues at ANWR by making some
clearer maps.  I also hoped that colleagues in USGS would see the
maps and then contact me if they needed additional mapping help.
I was careful to quote my sources and explain what I had done.  I
made no statement about what the maps might mean with regard
to oil development of the refuge.

The web pages were put up on Wednesday, March 7, last week.
The first thing I did when I put the ANWR pages up on the internet
was to inform other USGS Biological Resources Division mapping
people and other agency (Fish Wildlife Service and National Park
Service respectively) GIS people through email that they were on
the web.  Informing other Federal colleagues and agencies
immediately upon publication to the web appears to me to be the
only reasonable review process available, seeing as there is no
internal review website currently available...I have never been
informed of any other established proceedure for review of web
content on our site. I actually haven't had any complaints about or
requests to change any other map on my website...

I assumed that if anybody had a problem they could contact me
directly and quickly and appropriate steps could be taken almost
immediately. I received one warning from a colleague that the maps
I put on the internet should be removed.  Unfortunately, it was sent
on Saturday so I did not receive it in time.  I think the decision to
terminate me was taken before I even got to work on Monday.

I also assumed that because all I was doing was esentially
presenting existing public information in a clearer and improved
format, there was very little need for any extensive review other
than the steps I took.  Indeed the changes that I made to the
original Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) web maps were simply to
digitize them ("trace"), then overlay them on satellite and
vegetation maps and then summarize how may years specific
areas were a high density caribou calving area.  I found a similar
(poor quality) summary map on the FWS website that allowed me
to check the accuracy of my simple analysis.

I was unaware that FWS had updated the data.  There is no
mention of updated information on the FWS website.  This new
data has still to be made public. If my maps were inaccurate in any
way so are the public FWS maps I copied.... (please refer to
http://www.r7.fws.gov/nwr/arctic/pchmap2.html#section6)

I think that over the last three years I have put more maps up on
the internet (at a guess approaching 20,000 to 30,000 static
individual maps) equalling any other website on the world wide web.
So out of the tens of thousands of maps (and hours) I finally
publish one that got me fired....I suppose the odds were going to
run out eventually....

I am concerned that other Federal researchers may easily make
the same mistakes I just made and should learn from my example
what happens if you're not careful.

Patuxent was a great place to work, has amazing researchers and
everybody I worked with is very supportive.

        Ian Thomas


        Former Mapping Specialist at the:
        GIS & Remote Sensing Unit
        Biological Resources Division
        United States Geological Survey
        Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

Old Homepage (no longer available)
http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/geotech/home.html

The Global Environmental Atlas (no longer available)
http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/geotech/cindi/world.html





+++++++++++++++++++++
Michael R. Meuser,
[log in to unmask]

http://www.mapcruzin.com/
Community-Based Research, GIS, WebMaps,
Environmental Justice, Right-to-Know Advocacy

Website Archiving, Data Mining
http://www.mapcruzin.com/services.htm

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2018
January 2018
March 2017
December 2016
September 2013
June 2011
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
December 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager