JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  March 2001

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM March 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

The Class Structure of Flying

From:

Nick Blomley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nick Blomley <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:31:23 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (108 lines)

This came my way from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives....

1) The Class Structure of Flying by Jim Stanford
         I have finally succeeded in life.  No, I didn’t win the lottery.
And far from making me rich, my puny mutual fund has only kept pace with
the TSE’s downhill march.  Rather, the news of my upward mobility came
recently in the form of a glamourously embossed package >from Air Canada. 
Thanks to my many travels last year, I am now a prestigious “Elite” member
of their Aeroplan frequent flyer program.

  While naturally thrilled with my newfound status, I was also curiously
subdued.  For it seems to me that the overdeveloped hierarchy of frequent
flyer plans (there are 4 levels of membership in Aeroplan: regular,
Prestige, Elite, and Super-Elite) typifies the growing inequality of
airline travel these days–which in turn reflects the accelerating
inequality of our whole society.

     My Elite package included a snazzy gold membership card to replace my
plain old red one, now an embarrassing relic of my plebeian past.  Gold
luggage tags ensure that my bags are among the first off the plane.  I get
special secret phone numbers so that I’m never placed on hold when I call
to book a ticket.  And I get ten certificates for costless upgrades to the
first-class section of the plane.

  Once safely buckled into that extra-wide seat, I benefit from a menu of
luxuries ranging from nicer nuts to silver cutlery to free drinks.  For me,
the most important is the front cabin’s markedly higher bathroom-per-capita
ratio.  An Air Canada A320, for example, features one toilet exclusively
for the 24 roped-off first-class seats.  The back of the bus contains only
two more toilets for the remaining 108 passengers.  And even as Air Canada
insists that seat belts be worn throughout the flight for passenger safety,
it forces economy patrons to stand dangerously in line for the loo–rather
than use an empty first-class stall and violate this inflight apartheid.

    Like any class system, the class structure of flying demonstrates an
inherent tendency to increasing inequality: the rich get richer, and the
poor get bumped.  For example, Air Canada occasionally offers free upgrades
to first-class when its economy seats are oversold.  Who gets the free
upgrades?  Certainly not the passengers most in need of some extra
pampering–elderly travelers, disabled persons, or parents with children. 
The upgrades aren’t even handed out randomly, like a lottery.  Rather, the
airline uses its internal database to identify Super-Elite, Elite, or
Prestige members flying on the cheap that day.  They are called forward to
discreetly receive new first-class boarding passes.  Just like tax cuts,
this manna from heaven is handed out to those who are already rich.

   The same thing occurs when a flight is cancelled: super-elites get the
first seats on the next plane, regardless of who was at the airport first
or who really needs to get home the fastest.  It all makes bottom-line
sense for the airline, which works hard to please its big-money customers. 
After all, these elite flyers generate a huge share of Air Canada’s total
revenue.  But the policy runs smack into a knee-jerk principle of fairness
that we teach our children, and that still infiltrates our
consciousness–namely, the idea that reasonable human beings should wait
their turn.

  If the Titanic had been run on the same principles as Aeroplan, there
would have been an announcement over the loudspeakers after the ship hit
the iceberg: “General boarding of lifeboats will commence shortly. 
Super-Elite and Elite travelers may board at their convenience.”

      Modern business culture celebrates this inequality, consistent with
its enthusiastic embrace of the dog-eat-dog ethos.  Consider, for instance,
an ad for the Internet portal MySap.com.  A trim blonde executive is
sitting in a departure lounge when the flight is cancelled.  She turns on
her laptop, connects to MySap.com, and quickly rebooks herself on the next
flight.  She then reclines with a satisfied smile as the camera pans the
faces of less agile travelers–seniors, disheveled tourists, even a nun,
their confused expressions testimony to their pathetic inability to get
with the program.  Beating others to the first available airline seat
becomes a parable for succeeding more generally in capitalist competition.
         The goal is not just to get home fast.  It’s to get home faster
than someone else.  So Air Canada’s strategy is to make its most important
passengers feel they’ve been treated better than the others.  Some
first-class lounges are little more than overcrowded cafeterias.  But so
long as you must pass through guarded silver doors to get in, knowing that
the rest of the traveling hordes are excluded, then that overcrowded
cafeteria becomes a gold-plated perquisite.

       Class inequality pervades our society in innumerable ways, of
course, most of them far more important than the comparatively trivial
hierarchy of a modern airline.  Perhaps what makes the class structure of
flying so grating is the visibility and proximity of its divisions. 
Inequality is always more alarming and offensive when the rich and the poor
are right next to each other.  Latin American cities symbolize extreme
inequality because miserable slums are built right next to luxury
high-rises.  Similar gaps exist between, say, the teeming tenements of
Toronto’s St. Jamestown and the mansions of >Rosedale a few blocks north. 
But just enough distance separates the two neighbourhoods to prevent them
from being portrayed in a single shocking photograph.

        Following this same logic, Air Canada is now relocating its
first-class check-in desks to self-contained areas completely separate from
the long pens corralling economy passengers.  Elite travelers can now
speedily check-in without enduring angry glares from the queues they are
jumping.  Discreetly located first-class lounges follow the same recipe. 
But until Air Canada launches completely separate all-luxury flights, the
flying upper-crust must still be sensitive to the rabble lurking behind the
dangerously thin curtain behind their enclave.

    There’s one grain of solace for the traveling sods whose proletarian
status places them behind that curtain.  If a deranged lunatic should one
day invade the flight deck and seize control, consider this as the plane
plunges headlong to the ground: your life will last about one second longer
than the fat cats in first-class.
  The secret Elite reservation number is 1-888-738-1777: call early, call
often!

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager