|
|
Matola,Tod <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Please respond so that we can move this issue along.
I second the motion (or whatever we do in DC -- sorry I'm new) for defining
the URIs and terms.
I'd also love to get a corrected version of the schema that explains these
terms.
I think this should all happen ASAP so that incorrect data does not continue
to be developed.
We can decide what to put there later -- let's at least state that they
exist.
--
[ Aaron Swartz | [log in to unmask] | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
|
|
|
|