On 1/23/01, Isaac Neumann< [log in to unmask]> writes:
<< I think we make a good couple, Barrett,... like ying and yang. You try to
cool me down, I try to lighten you up. ;-) >>
***Deep down, I think that you may be underestimating Barrett, so that the
above situation may have been vice versa, all along. The prey may really be
the hunter and the watcher may be the watched.
<I will tell you little secret. I have sort of a nasty habit to provoke
people into discussions like this, hehehe. Can't help it. I just like to
rattle the scientific cage.>
***As long as what escapes from its cage enriches the science and practice of
what this group represents, may that cage continue to be rattled. However,
it would still be of value to see some scientific or clinical assessment of
craniosacral work - in other words, to see some substance behind the
rattling. You cannot wriggle so easily out of that cage of your own making -
let's see what's in the cage now :) No rattling, no provocation, no
laughter, just some hard, cool, unsmiling science. Now, about craniosacral
.........
Dr Mel C Siff
Denver, USA
|