JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES  2001

INT-BOUNDARIES 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Further on Sea level change and the LOS

From:

"Prof Maurice Mendelson Q.C." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Prof Maurice Mendelson Q.C.

Date:

Sat, 1 Sep 2001 12:35:51 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

Dear Dan,

I have been following the exchanges with interest, but as I have just got
back from holiday to a mound of work, I do not propose to comment - save on
your last para. below.  It is certainly an ingenious suggestion, but I
think that there could, at the least, be problems about advancing it.  I
have not looked up the trzvaux preparatoires, but my understanding is that
the definition of an island as "a naturally formed area of land" is to
distinguish it from one formed by - usually deliberate - changes brought
about by people adding concrete or whatever to an LTE (or even submerged
shoal).  In such a case, the change in the physical character of the area
is immediately (in both senses of the word) caused by human action.  In the
case of the sort of sea-level changes which you have been discussing, the
change comes about indirectly, unintentionally and over a long period of
time.  Similarly (mutatis mutandis) for the definition of LTEs. Bearing in
mind that humanity as a whole is part of nature, I am not at all sure that
the fact that it is humanity which is (allegedly) causing sea-level change
is a sufficient support for your argument.  And take the contrary case:
suppose that global human activity causes a change in sea levels which
causes an LTE to become an island.  My instinct tells me that that is as
much an island for LOS purposes than a new one created by volcanic
activity.  Moreover, your argument is essentially a kind of a contario one,
and experienced lawyers will tell you that such arguments are not necessary
valid.  Finally, an island which has been covered up by  UNNATURAL activity
(to accept your characterization for the sake of argument) is - once it has
been covered up - not really an area of land, it might well be argued.

There are other sorts of case which can arise (I have had one myself) where
the answer may be even less clear-cut.  Suppose, for instance, that a state
conducts dredging works in one area, and the (unintended) consequence is
that the sand etc. gradually builds up on a nearby LTE so that it becomes
permanently above water at high tide.  Is this a naturally formed island?

Best wishes,

Maurice Mendelson

At 09:49 31/08/01 EDT, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>I regret that I was not clear in my earlier message; I do not personally
> On the contrary, I
>think that baselines, straight or archipelagic, should be revised
>periodically to take account of changes in the physical environment and
> Indeed, Article 7 implies that straight baselines should
> My point was that the 1982 UN
> I doubt that countries will roll
>back their claims unless compelled to do so, and there is little impetus
from
>the Convention.
>
>I would also like your comments on the following argument, which I do not
>recall seeing elsewhere (if some else has postulated it, please give me the
> I might term it the Unnatural Causes argument.
>
>Assume that a mid-Ocean island nation has an outlying island that is very
> In 2001, it is inhabited and is recognized to have the full suite of
> The country does
> By the middle of 2002,
>sea-level rise has completely submerged the island, even at low tide.
>
>The country continues to claim the jurisdictional zones around this
submerged
>feature and maintains that the feature is still an island as defined by the
>1982 UN Convention, because the sea-level rise that inundated it is man-made
> According to Article 121 of the Convention, "An island is a
>naturally formed area of land, surrounded by water, which is above water at
> Similarly, low-tide elevations are defined as "naturally
> Since unnatural causes submerged the island, they must be
> (The island
> Moreover, the island nation is not principally
>
>Therefore, the "naturally formed" phrases in the Convention and
>considerations of equity require that the former island continue to be a
>"legal island" for purposes of maritime jurisdiction.
>
>Thanks for your comments,
>Dan Dzurek
>
>International Boundary Consultants
>3601 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 409
>Washington, DC 20016-3051
>& Fax: (202) 364-8403
> [log in to unmask]
>Website: www.Boundaries.com
>
Maurice Mendelson QC
Blackstone Chambers Barristers, Blackstone House, Temple, London EC4Y 9BW,
England.
Tel. +44 20 7583 17790; fax +44 20 7822 7350.

This message is a PRIVATE communication and may be privileged.   If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not
disclose it to others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.

Professor M.H. Mendelson QC
Faculty of Laws, University College London
Bentham House, 4 Endsleigh Gardens
London,
WC1H 0EG
ENGLAND

Tel. (+44) (0) 20 7679 1428 (direct 1446); fax (+44) (0) 20 7916 8539.

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
>message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager