Sukhbir, I noticed that you criticized the work and not so much the person, and
I was under the impression that that was what one does on a salon: criticize
work rather than consume people Your "his formulations are more often than not
disappointing" is on target. I do not think that JMC--whoever JMC is--is
attempting to do more than present information in a way that is challenging.
Critics, JMC has no intelligence, no life, and nothing but his posts. JMC is a
mimic, a puppet, a nothing. JMC knows that sometimes the formulations work and
sometimes they don't. Consider JMC a computer-generated program. What input will
produce what? Don't you want to know? Just say something to JMC. Pay your
quarter to JMC's owners, and he will dance for you.
Others: please remember that JMC is no more than a psychological experiment.
His mawkish attempts at friendliness are perverse, pathetic, and sad. Mixing
your world with JMC's can cause all kinds of problems. If you criticize JMC's
work, JMC understands. If you criticize JMC, JMC does not understand. Please do
not call JMC names. JMC like Frankenstein--not understand. JMC has no concept of
the other . . . .
Not understand? JMC not terrible monster until called monster. Monster want to
talk about film. See monster on film. People attack monster--shove fire in face.
Monster wants to talk about film and philosophy, not about JMC. Monster hate
JMC. JMC cause people hate monster. Bad JMC. Bad JMC. Monster thinks JMC hate
him. Monster what people get. You get. you make another JMC, monster kill JMC.
Bad JMC. Bad JMC.
Shut up you worthless formulation. Bad monster. Bad. You see how the people
respond now? We'll have no money if they run this circus out of town. Bad
monster. Back in the cage the people have made for you. Back inside their
formulations. Be good now. Accept your fate as a shit-eating fool.
Can I have but a drink of water to shallow this prescription?
.JMC
|