JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Archives


WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Archives

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Archives


WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Home

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Home

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT  2001

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

discrimination indices

From:

Richard Burton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

This list, hosted by the CASTLE project, is for those interested in conduct" <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:38:58 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (33 lines)

I have read with interest some of the exchanges on this site on
discrimination indices. Can I add my pennyworth, specifically a warning?

The indices are measures of the correlation between total test scores and
individual item scores. They can be calculated as correlation coefficients
or (easier in the old days) by data from the papers with the highest and
lowest scores (e.g. the top and bottom 27%). Either way, the indices are
dangerously unreliable if they are only based on a few hundred examinees.
I.e. good questions may be thrown away, with truly poor discriminators being
unrecognized as such.
Tables of criterion values have been published, against which to judge the
acceptability of the indices. These are not valid.
Where blind guessing of answers is not discouraged (e.g. by negative
marking), the indices are even less reliable.
I do not think that significnce levels for the correlation coefficients are
helpful.
I have written this up in a paper soon to be published:
'Do Item Discrimination Indices really help us to improve our tests'.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (3) June 2001.

Improving the reliability of multiple choice and true/false tests is of
particular interest to me and to my colleague David Miller - see also the
next two papers:

Burton R.F and Miller D.J. (2000) Statistical modelling of multiple-choice
and true/false tests: ways of considering, and of reducing, the
uncertainties attributable to guessing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 24 (4), 399-411.

Burton R.F (2001) Quantifying the effects of chance in multiple choice and
true/false tests: question selection and guessing of answers. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), 41-50.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
April 2019
March 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
June 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager