JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for UTSG Archives


UTSG Archives

UTSG Archives


UTSG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UTSG Home

UTSG Home

UTSG  2001

UTSG 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Problems with the BLS statistics of household expenditure on transportation

From:

Todd Litman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Todd Litman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 06:44:17 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

Thank you for the positive comments on my Equity paper.

At least one economist agrees with your analysis, and I suspect there are
many others. James Poterba argues that household expenditures are a better
measure of wealth than household income for the reasons you describe (James
Poterba, "Reexaminations of Tax Incidence: Lifetime Incidence and the
Distributional Burden of Excise Taxes," The American Economic Review, Vol.
79, No. 2, May 1989, p. pp. 325-330.). I beleive that this information can
be extracted from BLS data, but may be more difficult to obtain from other
sources and other countries.

However, I doubt that this would change the basic finding that
transportation expenditures tend to be a greater portion of household
income/expenditures/wealth for lower-income households (i.e., they tend to
be regressive), and that measures which improve transportation options such
as walking and public transit can particularly benefit lower-income
households.

For additional discussion of this issue by geographic location I recommend
"Driven to Spend; The Impact of Sprawl on Household Transportation
Expenses," by Barbara McCann, available from the STPP (www.transact.org),
2000.


Sincerely,

Todd Litman, Director
Victoria Transport Policy Institute
"Efficiency - Equity - Clarity"
1250 Rudlin Street
Victoria, BC, V8V 3R7, Canada
Phone & Fax: 250-360-1560
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Website: http://www.vtpi.org



At 02:34 PM 3/29/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Dear list members:
>
>In his excellent paper: "Evaluating Transportation Equity"
>(http://www.vtpi.org/equity.doc), Todd Litman (Victoria Transport Policy
>Institute) makes the point Transportation expenditures are highest as a
>portion of income for lower-income households, indicating that automobile
>dependency is a financial burden to the poor.
>
>However, working with the BLS statistics of household expenditure on
>transportation by income class
>(http://www.bls.gov/csx/1999/share/income.pdf), I find a problem when I want
>to compare these data with similar data from other countries. What seems odd
>to me is the fact that for the 5 lowest income classes, "Average annual
>expenditures" are much higher than "Income after taxes".
>
>Table 46. (Income before taxes: Shares of average annual expenditures and
>sources of income, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 1999)
>
>Income after taxes 1,234 7,576 12,163 16,927 23,487 32,458
>41,405 54,073 101,061
>Average annual expenditures $18,015 $14,926 $19,722 $24,366
>$28,963 $35,077 $40,868 $49,615 $76,812
>
>This might be due to the fact that: (i) Consumer units whose members
>experience a spell of unemployment may draw on their savings to maintain
>their expenditures, (ii) Self-employed consumers may experience business
>losses that result in low or even negative incomes but they are able to
>maintain their expenditures by borrowing or relying on savings, (iii)
>Students may get by on loans while they are in school, and retirees may rely
>on savings and investments.
>
>This, I think, seriously impairs the conclusions that can be drawn from the
>BLS data.
>
>In many countries, households are not ranked by income but by total income
>per unit of consumption. These "units of consumption" are calculated by a
>formula (A+bC)^d, where A is the number of adults in the household, C is the
>number of children in the household, b is a coefficient smaller than one
>(generally 0.5 or 0.7) to take into account the fact that children consume
>less, and d is a coefficient reflecting the economy of scale that results
>from household size.
>
>Are similar calculations used by any other institution producing data on
>household expenditure on transport?
>
>Than you very much for any help, and appologies for my approximate English.
>
>Richard Darbera
>Professor
>Ecole Nationale des Ponts & Chaussees
>6-8 Avenue Blaise Pascal
>Cite Descartes
>F77455 Marne la Vallee Cedex 2
>FRANCE
>Tel: 33 1 64 15 38 34
>Fax: 33 1 64 15 36 00
>e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>

Sincerely,

Todd Litman, Director
Victoria Transport Policy Institute
"Efficiency - Equity - Clarity"
1250 Rudlin Street
Victoria, BC, V8V 3R7, Canada
Phone & Fax: 250-360-1560
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Website: http://www.vtpi.org

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager