JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SEDA Archives


SEDA Archives

SEDA Archives


SEDA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SEDA Home

SEDA Home

SEDA  2001

SEDA 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Teaching distance learning courses - summary of comments

From:

John Casey {Information Services} <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Casey {Information Services} <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:03:27 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (107 lines)

Thanks for the survey results it has been very useful as ammunition for
deabte here, I thought you find this useful:


The findings of this survey nicely complement the research output of the
ESRC funded "Space, Place and the Virtual University" at Newcaste, which
uses case studies and is well worth a read for those who are making plans to
implement distance learning supported by ICT. The research makes interesting
reading and points to the need to plan ahead and for the need to change work
patterns. It also confirms the need for institutions to make strategic plans
in this area that include changes in policy, organisation and resourcing.

Here is the web site for the Space, Place and the Virtual University
project:

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds/vuniv/index.htm

If you would like to download the pdf file containing the research article
referred to above, here is the URL:

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds/vuniv/JCLA.pdf




John Casey
University of Stirling
Stirling
FK9 4LA
Scotland
Tel: + 44 (0)1786 466879 or + 44 (0)1786 466224
Fax: + 44 (0)1786 466880

> ----------
> From: Liz McDowell
> Reply To: Liz McDowell
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:41 am
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Teaching distance learning courses - summary of comments
>
> A few weeks ago I posed a question about lecturer workloads in relation to
> distance learning (in a 'conventional' university). Thanks to those who
> replied and here is a brief summary for those who are interested.
>
> The general view was that university managers (and I guess popular
> opinion) is that distance learning is a cheap option whereas, in fact, it
> is just as intensive in staff time, if not more so than face-to-face modes
> of teaching. The bulk of lecturer time is spent on two kinds of activity:
> first the upfront preparation of materials; and secondly, throughout the
> course, lots of time spent in communication with students (email,
> discussion lists, telephone and so on) advising and helping them,
> giving feedback, dealing with problems; updating information they need;
> discussing course topics; encouraging and motivating students; organising
> student groups etc etc! The size of the student group you are teaching is
> therefore crucial in distance learning.
>
> Now for the information people gave me about current practice. The
> workload allocation policies I was told about ranged from:
> * No workload allocation at all for teaching distance learners -
> except, perhaps, for the first stage of materials preparation.
> * A workload allocation similar to a 'normal' course. So if a
> particular module would have taken 3 hours per week in teaching hours
> (class contact) lecturers would be given 3 hours for teaching a distance
> learning version.
> * Workload allocation based on both the size of the module being
> taught and the numbers of distance learning students.
>
> Those working in other contexts should note that most of my replies came
> from people teaching in the UK in 'new' universities or teaching on HE
> courses in Further Education colleges. There is an approach in these
> settings to calculating workloads on the basis of 'teaching hours' which
> has conventionally meant 'class contact' hours. Of course, there are many
> local variations on the detail of how this is done in practice. One or
> two people commented that this approach was a very unhelpful starting
> point for working out what staff time was really needed for teaching
> distance learners.
>
> There was some discussion about whether there was a limit to the number of
> distance learners lecturers could cope with. One college had found that a
> lecturer could work effectively with about 20 distance learners in the
> equivalent of about 25% of their normal teaching workload. In another
> context lecturers were limited to 76 distance learners if that was their
> full teaching workload. If you do the calculations that comes to about
> the same thing.
>
> It was disturbing to get reports of some very difficult situations which
> lecturers had found themselves in with lots of distance learners to teach
> and no time in which to do it. Going back to the first point I made, I
> guess we have to keep raising the issue where we can, to persuade managers
> and others that distance learning needs teachers and it is not just a
> cheap option. We still then need a fair and practical way to estimate what
> amount of staff time really is involved.
>
> Liz
>
>
> *********
> Liz McDowell
> Networked Learning Project Manager
> University of Northumbria
> Newcastle upon Tyne
> UK, NE1 8ST
> Tel. 0191-227-4483/3048
> **********
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager