> sounds like an interesting project. you might want to be sure to include
> the webartery people on your list.
most of our current energy is concentrated on trying to make the low-fi locator
system and underpinning admin system work better. we will soon be able to focus
more on inputting projects. there is a form on the interface which enables
artists/curators to input projects directly, so please go ahead and use this.
any bug reports, comments and feedback are welcome.
X XXXXX XX XXX XXXXX X X
X XXXX XX X XXX XXXXX XXX X
X XXXX XX X XXX X X X X
X XXXX XX X X X XXXXX XXX X
X XX XXX X XXXXXX XXX X
net art locator
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "luci eyers" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 12:54 PM
> Subject: lo-fi/low-fi
>> >From: Richard Gribenas <[log in to unmask]>
>> >To: [log in to unmask]
>> >Subject: New to the list! with a question
>> >Date: Thu, May 10, 2001, 5:57 pm
>> > I thought I might start a line about Lo-Fi in digital
>> > culture and art.
>> > It exists but what does it mean to Media art and such. any
>> > thoughts?
>> I am working within a group called low-fi. our main focus is developing a
>> project called the low-fi locator which is a system for locating net art.
> we are
>> using the term quite loosely in order to indicate that we privilege
>> over technological virtuosity. Technical complexity and sophistication
>> need to be used essentially because it is the only way to realise a
>> idea rather superfluously or as decoration.
>> the locator is still in development phase and a bit raw and buggy but we
> will be
>> launching it soon to this and other lists for input and testing.
>> X XXXXX XX XXX XXXXX X X
>> X XXXX XX X XXX XXXXX XXX X
>> X XXXX XX X XXX X X X X
>> X XXXX XX X X X XXXXX XXX X
>> X XX XXX X XXXXXX XXX X
>> net art locator