JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  2001

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Context or Content? Questions in conjunction with Interactive Screen and the forthcoming book "Context Providers"

From:

Lucas Bambozzi <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/

Date:

Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:45:02 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (81 lines)

On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 18:37:37 +0100, Mathew Kabatoff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Do you consider yourself a content of context provider?
>
>
>In your opinion what is the difference, relationship and intersection
>between content and context?


Hi,

I just joined the list and found two interesting postings from Michael Kabatoff. The report about the Banff meeting was
particularly useful for those who didn't attend it. Good to keep track on how these meetings are bridging 'pre' and 'post-web'
media. Today’s scene, when even interactivity seems an obsolete discussion I am always pleased to see any effort to close
gaps between media that were supposed to be contaminating each other with no precedence in history.

No more than a couple of years ago the interface was said to be the key element to experience content [Lev Manovich – A
Theory of Cultural Interfaces]. Context may be the deal for now but I really want to separate what is mereley hype from what
really matters. The first time I’ve heard about a sort of confront content-context it sounded like a natural conflict for me – I found it
written in a text by Roy Ascot seven years ago. Now I feel that there is something else behind the emphasis that makes me
think about an open-ended relativism where one artist push his convictions [sometimes dogmas] against another. I wonder
how true would be other assertions like: the medium is the content, the context is the medium, the medium is dead, the content
is the context or we can foresee many other responsibilities for the artists today. The only rule I find is that of the instability of all
media. And I guess this list seem the best place to have my cloudy thoughts clarified.

Context seems to have a parallel with the way we understand ready-made [a wrong object in a right time in a safe and precise
place – swapping the subject can make it even better] or when a video/film-artist deals with found-footage, the way Paik used to
re-process his videos depending on the… context (!?), or how Sophie Calle used to deal with works such as Lost Wallet or the
Venetian Suite – just mentioning a random range of possibilities to understand and apply the terminology to other ways of
producing conceptual art. Not so many artists actually ‘create’ context. It’s more like a given subject/matter that can be
appropriated and turned into art by an enlightened creator. But such subversion used to be the core of the experiences from the
60’s or it is exactly what Fluxus has helped me to think about what media-art can be.

So what is a ‘media-artist’ today? Do you think such a concept no longer applies at all? "What next’ is really the point? Please,
don’t consider that as a naïve question. It’s a relief to see artists dealing with the limitation of systems such as PDA’s, pagers,
SMS, Wap, or by reinventing the function of systems originally designed for merely functional purposes – that’s what I have been
trying to do. But as I see it, it is not so different from what happened with the videotape, the web or other communication
systems [there is even a comfortable sensation when I see artists dealing with systems far beyond communication systems.
Probably there is a similar feeling when you watch a movie or experience an installation, and you really appreciate it, but it
doesn’t fit very well in the way you produce your artwork. So you may celebrate the diversity in the art scene. That’s wonderful.
For curators, this sensation might be slightly different – please, let me know how wrong I am].

I’m not nostalgic at all. My work covers a wide range of media, from old-fashioned ones [such as video, film, installation and
interactive stuff] to new experiences with media that are just starting to appear [and I really don’t know for sure how to del with
that]. So I think there is no prejudice in my way of thinking, as either the context and the content are equally important for me.

I remember when there was a promise that all these media would be merged on the web or by converging its techniques and
procedures. I have to confess that it happened in a more radical way than I could expect. Again, an artist should celebrate such
challenge and radicalism. The dark side is that the circuits for digital arts are so fragmented that they currently ignore each
other. Through my own experience, going from a video festival to a new media conference is like to visit two different worlds.
Many of the interesting young artists that are doing nice works today started it exactly in the intersection between the ‘pre’ and
‘post-web’ ages [somewhere lost from 1995 to 200]. For creative purposes, the in-between is a nice place to be. New media
still has no clear definition – and it might be good! We are not in full control of anything, are we? When one can talk so seriously
about a subject it may mean that it is over [as far as I remember that was the Baudrillard’s excuse/argument when he invited us
to forget Foucault]. Despite I can’t see clearly the reasons of the contest between context and content, I can clearly distinguish
one from the other. That’s not the point. For instance, I would rather consider that one is inside another, and if I am not missing
something very important, they can be swapped instantly – just like the words suggest, for instance, as a shockwave-based-
concrete-poem for the web can do, just by exchanging a small letter.
So please, would you let me know where can I find more out of it. A suggestion of recent bibliography about such a dichotomy
would be perfect.


Lucas Bambozzi
*sorry about the poor English


CAiiA-STAR Centre
Visiting Artist
School of Computing - University of Plymouth
Plymouth PL4 8AA UK

70 Fellows Rd. Flat C
London NW3 3LJ UK

Rua Capote Valente, 1457/41
05409-003 - São Paulo SP
Brazil

[log in to unmask]
http://www.comum.com/diphusa/links.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager