JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-METAMORPHISM Archives


GEO-METAMORPHISM Archives

GEO-METAMORPHISM Archives


GEO-METAMORPHISM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-METAMORPHISM Home

GEO-METAMORPHISM Home

GEO-METAMORPHISM  2001

GEO-METAMORPHISM 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: metam facies confusion

From:

Bruce Bathurst <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

No title defined <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:57:43 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)

Requiem for a Facies

It seems ironic that the hornfels facies
are being dropped as insignificant to
the facies classification, when it was
their discovery that led to the creation
of the mineral facies classification of
rocks. (However, perhaps one can now add
'hornfels' to the base terms 'schist,
gneiss, & granofels'.)

Eskola had placed little value upon
facies names, which he offered as
'provisional'. He was uncomfortable with
coining 'hornfels facies', as it had
just been used in a different sense by
Goldschmidt near Oslo. Eliminating the
name might not have bothered him, though
eliminating the facies probably would.
It eliminates a bit of history.

These hornfelses proved the existence of
mineral facies. After blending a bit of
Gibbs, Bowen, CIPW, & Grubenmann into an
hypothesis, both Goldschmidt's triangle
from Christiania and Eskola's triangle
from Orijarvi were finally decomposed
into 'tie triangles' of equilibrium
mineral assemblages. When the chemical
plots of hornfelses from the literature
faithfully fell within their minerals'
fields, the mineral facies was invented.
Each complex of tie triangles,
representing a facies, labeled a
different (equilibrium) intensive state.

To illustrate their value, Eskola just
picked some rocks whose environments
were known: a sample bouquet to
illustrate the classification. Two
contact hornfelses of differing depth he
already had; he picked one each from
Grubenmann's shallow, medium, and deep
zones; sanidine-bearing xenoliths had
been very hot & shallow; and eclogite
underlay even granulites.

>From Grubenmann came most facies names:
eclogite & granulite from his deep zone,
amphibolite from his medium zone,
glaucophane schist from his shallow
zone. Where greenschist came from, I
don't know; but Eskola defined the
facies using a green schist from
Grubenmann's shallow zone. Gabbroic
rocks (metabasites) were preferred
because Osann's ACF triangles was ideal
for them, Bowen's discontinuous reaction
series showed their solutions limited,
stability ordered; and - they created
more little tie trianges on his
diagrams.

It was Eskola's hope that people would
create their own facies names, used
locally. Facies, as opposed to most
isograds, are environmentally sensitive
but independent of composition. They are
identified in the field, using a lens,
from an association of rocks containing
typical assemblages, or the occasional
single rock containing a critical
assemblage. Facies were for everyone.

The hornfels facies will be sadly
missed.


Bruce Bathurst

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager