JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-METAMORPHISM Archives


GEO-METAMORPHISM Archives

GEO-METAMORPHISM Archives


GEO-METAMORPHISM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-METAMORPHISM Home

GEO-METAMORPHISM Home

GEO-METAMORPHISM  2001

GEO-METAMORPHISM 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

infiltration

From:

Eric Essene <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

No title defined <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:08:25 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (66 lines)

All,
   Metasediments that originally had organic material are strongly
perturbed during metamorphism in terms of fO2 relative to a common buffer
curve. Such rocks often have diagenetic ferromagnesian silicates that are
out of equilibrium with methane, and they may be reduced during the early
stages of metamorphism. We find iron formations in the granulite facies
that have fO2 comparable to QFM, but which may have started out before
metamorphism considerably above this buffer, although it is difficult to be
sure without finding the same lithology at all grades. Some high grade
iron formations have ferromagnesian silicates with Mg# of 50-75 and
register oxidation along an s-buffer producing quartz and matnetite during
metamorphism. Peter Robinson and coworkers nicely demonstrated a large
shift to more magnesian bulk compositions of metamorphic rocks in W.
Massachusetts as a result of substantial metasomatic effects. Production
of increased quantities of Fe oxides or Fe sulfides often marks the
s-process leading to more magnesian silicates, although in many cases the
metasomatic process occurred before regional metamorphism.
eric


>
>I can't resist weighing in on this discussion.
>
>Dugald started off with an elegant equilibrium discussion of how to
>view buffering, but ended with a kinetic argument. The first question
>that should be addressed for any "s-buffer" (and I like your
>introduction of this distinction) is the "buffer capacity" of the
>assemblage from an equilibrium thermodynamic perspective. After the
>equilibrium condition is established, one can (and should, as you
>point out) add the kinetic perspective, which can often dominate the
>result.
>
>A useful quantity to calculate for your s-buffer assemblage in the
>KFMASH-O2 system for the assemblage Grt+Bt+Mu+Mt+Qtz+aqueous vapor
>phase is the partial derivative (¸Xalm/¸f(O2))P,T. This will provide
>an equilibrium view of the sensitivity of the garnet Fe/Mg to changes
>in f(O2). Another useful quantity is (¸Mgrt/¸f(O2))T,P (where M is
>the amount of the phase), which will provide a measure of the amount
>of garnet (or any other phase) that will be consumed/produced as a
>function of f(O2). It is also useful to quantify the amount of oxygen
>required, in which case a useful derivative is (¸Mgrt/¸M(O2))T,P.
>
>Since most minerals are dominantly oxygen, I suspect one would find
>that most metamorphic assemblages are pretty effective s-buffers.
>That is, the value of f(O2) is pretty nearly totally controlled by
>the internal equilibrium. I know of no examples where major changes
>in f(O2) have been documented in regionally metamorphosed rocks as a
>result of infiltration.
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Frank
>----------------------------------------------
>Frank Spear
>Professor and Chair
>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, JRSC 1C25
>Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
>110 8th Street
>Troy, New York 12180-3590
>Phone (office): 518-276-6103
> (lab) : 518-276-4899
>Fax: 518-276-6680
>http://ees2.geo.rpi.edu/spear/spear.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager