JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FISH Archives


FISH Archives

FISH Archives


FISH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FISH Home

FISH Home

FISH  2001

FISH 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Joined up Heritage Services

From:

Ruth Mostern <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH)

Date:

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:41:37 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (206 lines)

Dear All,

Another organization with similar aims is the Electronic Cultural Atlas
Initiative (www.ecai.org).  ECAI is a global consortium of historians,
archaeologists, cultural heritage managers and others interested in
interoperability and GIS visualization.  We are working with the TimeMap
Project (www.timemap.net) to create a global clearinghouse of cultural and
historical spatial data linked to a time-enabled GIS browser.  The
clearinghouse is based on Dublin Core, with two kinds of
extensions.  Administrative extensions (ecai.) describe the relationship of
the dataset to the ECAI institutional structure, and are helping us, among
other things, to manage a review system for submitted data. Functional
(tm.) extensions make it possible to map spatial objects from registered
databases on the time-enabled GIS browser, rather than simply providing a
bibliographical index.  The goal is to provide a mechanism for scholars and
cultural heritage managers to freely disseminate cultural spatial data in
an interoperable environment.

In addition to creating and populating the clearinghouse, ECAI seeks to
assist collaborators in understanding the value of spatial data for
cultural heritage and the humanities and to create and register data.  We
hold conferences and training workshops, and are engaged in an initiative
to create stable electronic publications based on historical and cultural
spatial resources.

We are very interested in collaborating with HEIRPORT or any other
institutions with related objectives.

If anybody is interested in more information about ECAI, or in submitting
data to the clearinghouse, please contact me.

Ruth Mostern
Head of Collections Development
Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative
www.ecai.org



At 12:43 PM 11/2/01 +0000, kmf2 wrote:
>Dear Niall,
>
>The HEIRNET consortium has already begun to think about what might be
>involved in creating a virtual historic environment information network.
>The HEIRNET report looked at the potential contributors to such a
>network (the NMRs, SMRs, ADS, Nationally funded projects, special
>interest societies, local societies) from across the UK. Developments in
>IT mean that it is feasible to bring together all of their various
>databases, catalogues and indexes to create a historic environment
>information landscape reaching into Europe and beyond.
>
>We know that the technology works. The ADS has been working with members
>of the HEIRNET consortium  on two projects recently. The first, the
>HEIRNET register is creating a metadata catalogue that will provide an
>index to the content, status and accessibility of the HEIRs that make up
>the landscape. The second, is the development of HEIRPORT a z39.50
>web-portal. The ADS catalogue, the NMR for Scotland and the Portable
>Antiquities database are already being joined up in HEIRPORT by virtue
>of their compliance with MIDAS and using Dublin Core metadata and the
>z39.50 communications protocol.
>
>Technology can make it work but people make it happen! It is important
>to realise that HEIRPORT allows for distributed databases to be searched
>simultaneously. This allows organisations to develop their own databases
>to support their operational functions - development control,
>conservation, management, research - while enabling others to access and
>use their resources.
>
>People increasingly do have access to the Internet and we know that they
>are making use of existing resources. The ADS catalogue has in excess of
>1,000,000 hits each year. The CBA information pages, geared to a general
>interest audience, has far in excess of this number of hits. We can
>confidently say that historic environment information resources made
>available on the Internet will be used and that use will be increased by
>participating in a joined-up service like HEIRPORT.
>
>Joining HEIRPORT does not imply giving up management of your own
>database but will improve your access to the live content of databases
>managed by others. As more organisations join HEIRPORT, instead of
>waiting for data exchange, you will be able to search your own database
>alongside others and view the latest information on your desk-top. By
>sharing information, each organisation should be able to make the most
>of its limited resources for the task in hand.
>
>I would like to invite any SMR who was thinking about mounting a
>database on the Internet to contact me to talk about joining up with
>HEIRPORT. It can accomodate 100 SMRs and more...
>
>with best wishes,
>
>Kate Fernie
>
>
>Niall Hammond wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Following the rising tide of comments  seen over the last few weeks on
> the FISH
> > gis conference and more recently on SMR Forum regarding the disparity in
> > heritage  information that front-line local government archaeology
> services both
> > need and can provide compared with English Heritage, is the time ripe
> to ask a
> > very fundamental question?  Why in such a poorly resourced sector do we
> have a
> > network of SMRs, an NMR, ADS and  separate listing/scheduling mapping
> sections?
> > Many of which seem to be re-inventing the wheel in various electronic
> > guises...some more round in shape than others.
> >
> > Surely with improvements in IT technology we could use existing
> resources much
> > more effectively if we adopted something allong the lines of the
> following model
> > which would still allow flexibility and a degree of local idosynchranicity
> >
> >    EH      provide a national archive(NMR aerial photos, hard copy
> material  and
> >    ADS digital catalogue) and a national framework/standard for SMR
> structure
> >    and content. The NMR as an electronic database in its current form
> is phased
> >    out.
> >
> >    ADS/EH/ALGAO      develop a national virtual heritage record. This
> would hold
> >    no data itself but merley be a front end search engine which allows
> anyone to
> >    remotely question and search all English(ultimately British?) SMRs
> through
> >    the adoption of the national standard utilising Dublin Core and Z39.50
> >    standards(something which the progressive HLF funding programmes should
> >    achieve anyway). A good search engine design should allow specific
> topics,
> >    themes ,geographical areas etc. to be seperately available to the users
> >    hearts content.
> >
> >    SMRs    gain additional resources and staff to adopt the national
> standard,
> >    provide detailed GIS mapping at a useful scale, improve content and
> deliver
> >    informed heritage information to a local audience meeting local specific
> >    demands whilst still contributing their data to the national picture
> with new
> >    data effectively going on-line within hours/days of being added to an
> >    individual SMR.
> >
> > Now obviously this will upset  lot of people, tread on vested interest and
> > demolish institutions we have come to know and love(?!), The end
> product will
> > however be a true national system but one informed by and meeting
> specific local
> > demand and needs. I might even guess it would be cheaper than the
> current muddle
> > and definitely be best value. Shouldn't we be brave enough to embark on
> this ?
> >
> > DCMS are currently inviting comments on EH as part of the quinquennial
> review
> > process of government agencies,(look on the DCMS site at
> www.culture.gov.uk for
> > the papers and details or email [log in to unmask]). Surely
> then there
> > is an opportunity to raise this issue begging a response?
> >
> > The IT technology exists for such a system including on-line GIS
> functionality
> > as we are adopting it for the next phase of the Durham on-line SMR, our HLF
> > funded Keys to the Past project with Northumberland CC, so any or most
> problems
> > of  different IT at different local authorties should be able to be
> overcome on
> > a timescale which EH and their digital capture of SM information for
> one  don't
> > seem able to meet.
> >
> > Thoughts on several postcards gratefully received.
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > Niall Hammond
> > County Archaeology Officer
> > ALM Department
> > Durham County Council
> > County Hall
> > Durham
> > DH1 5TY
> >
> > Tel 0191 383 4212
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
> > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>
>--
>Kate Fernie
>Research Officer
>Archaeology Data Service
>
>Dept of Archaeology     t 0044 (0)1904 433973
>University of York      f 0044 (0)1904 433939
>England YO1 7EP, UK
>http://ads.ahds.ac.uk   e [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
December 2023
September 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
February 2016
January 2016
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
October 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager