Apologies from me for nov 28. I agree with Chris, it would be good to move
into looking at research methods in more depth. I know that is on the
agenda this time with the co-operative enquiry and I am keen to know how
this goes and what the conclusions are. Do we need to hear from some of
these "computer modelling bods". There were some interesting letters on the
BMJ website from some following the complexity articles.
Dan
On 19 November 2001 12:08, Chris Burton [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
wrote:
> Regret I won't be at this one.
>
> My thought for the next one though: what about a workshop specifically
about
> research methods that go into complexity territory and bridge the gap
> between pure qualitative and quantitative stuff.
>
> Perhaps that's not even a Tufton, possibly that meeting should be
something
> else.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Complexity and chaos theories applied to primary medical and
> > social care [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
> > Krysia Saul
> > Sent: 01 November 2001 12:54
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: November's complexity meeting
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone, at present only those listed below have confirmed their
> > wish to attend the November 28 conference. I suspect there are
> > more! Please can you let me know as soon as possible as I have
> > to t think about the hospitality arrangements. Many thanks, Krysia
> >
> > Julian Pratt
> > Hugh Reeve
> > Andrew Innes
> > Paul Hodgkin
> > Iona Heath (afternoon only)
> > Jo Poole
> > Judith Harvey
> > Anne Marie Cunningham
> >
> >
|