JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS  2001

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

US War Against Terrorism

From:

Karl Carlile <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Karl Carlile <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:10:34 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (175 lines)

Be free to visit the web site of the Communist Global Group at
http://homepage.eircom.net/~beprepared/

------------------------


US War Against Terrorism
Failures? or Successes?

By our political correspondent

It has been four weeks that the United States B-2 Stealth Bombers and B-52s are
carpet-bombing Afghan cities and mountains, plains and villages, hills and
ditches, roads and streets, houses and hospitals, barracks and warehouses. What
is the result? Osama Bin Laden is still alive and safe at his hideout and Mullah
Omar and his government is more stable than a month ago.


But, Washington insists they are making progress in the war. What is this
progress about? What are the objectives of White House that it is pursuing
through this war? President Bush and his team including Secretary of State and
Secretary of Defense are asking people to be patient as this war may take months
rather years to reach its logical end. What are they up to? There is no match
between the military might of Afghanistan and US then why months and years? Why
they want to linger on the campaign?


These and thousands of other questions are hitting the minds of every sane
person in the World who has respect to innocence, life of innocent people and
above all respect for a human being. For them it is an equally brutal tragedy if
an innocent person dies in the WTC attack or in a village in Afghanistan.


They want to know: why the precision weapons are hitting homes and hospitals in
Afghanistan instead of bunkers of Mullah Omar and Osama Bin Laden? They want to
know: why US is pushing Pakistan deeply in the war knowing that the masses in
Pakistan do not support the US attacks on Afghanistan.


Though most of these questions are still unanswered, it is clear that the real
agenda of the United States was not the arrest or killing of Osama Bin Laden or
his associates. New Yorker reports that Mullah Omar's convoy in Kandhar was on
the target of US warplanes when the controllers were told not to fire at him and
let the convoy proceed without problems.


Le Figaro reports that CIA's head in Dubai visited Bin Laden in American
Hospital last July where he underwent treatment for kidney problems. He flew
back to Quetta after 10 days of treatment by a private jet, the newspaper adds
and the CIA official bragged among colleagues of having an interview with Bin
Laden.


Bin Laden is merely a hoax. He may have done all the sins in the World, but he
was not behind the tragedies of September 11 and the US Government knows it very
well. But, he is being used as a dummy target to implement the real agenda of
White House and that real agenda of the US is being unfolded in the region very
precisely and gradually.


The actual targets were not Mullah Omar or Bin Laden. The real targets were
General Parvez Musarraf and Pakistan's nuclear arsenal and unfortunately General
Parvez Musharraf walked into the well-laid out plans and is now in deep trouble.


The initial speeches of President Musharraf indicate that he was given the
impression that the air strikes on Afghanistan will be "targeted" and for a
"short period" to bust the so-called terrorists. But, as soon as the US military
took over the bases in Balochistan, the US Government openly declared that they
had long term plans - for months or even years to stay there.


The presence of US troops on Pakistan's soil created massive unrest in the
country, as expected because of the historical, traditional and religious bonds
between the people of Pakistan and Afghanistan. To flare up the sentiments of
the people in Pakistan, the US forces demanded more airbases and kept on
demanding facilities in Sindh and even Punjab provinces that do not share any
border with Afghanistan.


The US did not contend with these provocations and also started hitting civilian
areas in Afghanistan. Thought the US Generals and Pentagon officials attributed
these attacks on civilians as mistakes, it is simply unbelievable that precision
bombing devices dropped from the World's best known bombers B-2 and B-52 were so
inaccurate that they could hit homes two kilometers away? Not possible.


These bombings on civilian population were carried out intentionally to flare up
the public emotions and sentiments in Pakistan to a point where Pakistan's Army,
intelligentsia, politicians and business people - all get united against Parvez
Musharraf and the country faces a serious threat from with in.


Unlike its perceived target - killing or capturing Osama Bin Laden, the US was
really successful in destabilizing Pakistan with in four weeks. Today General
Musharraf is completely isolated by the people. He knows it that he would not be
able to live in Pakistan for a single day if he is not in the office.


And now among this situation the US is raising the questions about the security
of Pakistan's nuclear warheads. According to the US strategists, Pakistans
nuclear arsenal is not safe so what Pakistan should do is to hand over these
weapons to US for safe custody or deploy the US forces on Pakistan's nuclear
sites.


The whole US media is now discussing Pakistan's nuclear arsenal in the same way
as they put Bin Laden to the media trial. No solid information. No plausible
reasons. No clue of what they are talking about. But, they all have the same
opinion - US must take over Pakistan's nuclear weapons and sites. It seems that
the whole media has been told to orchestrate this theme for next few weeks as
they were told not to carry statements and videos of Bin Laden.


Here is the ploy. Had Musharraf refused cooperation to the US in so-called
anti-terrorism war, the US would have declared Pakistan as an ally of Mullah
Omar - Bin Laden coalition and would have bombed Pakistan's nuclear sites. Since
Musharraf supported US out rightly and thus eliminated the justifications to
attack Pakistan, the US went ahead with a dummy target - Bin Laden to move
forces inside Pakistan and to create such an environment where Pakistan could
not have any option but to hand over every thing to US.


We don't have confidence in Musharraf's strategic thinking and planning. In fact
he has proved himself a failure ever since he took over power in Pakistan after
a coup in 1999. He has no programme, no ideology, no brain to analyse the
military or political challenges being faced by the nation, and most importantly
no roots among the masses.


If Musharraf thinks that his policies can help Pakistan find a panacea for its
economic woes, he is wrong. At the one hand the US and its allies are lifting
sanctions on Pakistan imposed for multiple reasons and at the other hand
Pakistan's exports have been literally blocked. No country including US and its
closest allies such as Britain, Canada, UAE, Japan, France, Germany etc. is
giving visas to Pakistanis. Almost all the airlines of the World have stopped
flights to Pakistan. Numerous new problems are being created by PIA flights and
its passengers going abroad. Containers after containers of Pakistan's exports
are being returned from European and American ports. What a great hypocritical
policies.


Musharraf is doing what the US needs. He changed Army's top leadership just a
day ahead of the US attack on Afghanistan, arrested Pakistan's very respectable
nuclear scientists, removed senior Police officers in some cities only for being
religious minded, ordered law enforcing agencies to open fire on unarmed but
very angry protestors. All these actions helped creating and multiplying chaos,
confusion and uncertainty in Pakistan - some thing that the US requires to
implement its real plans.


Although his government is denying that they have not allowed the US forces to
enter the no-fly zones around Pakistan's nuclear sites, but who is going to
believe him? He had repeatedly said that Pakistan had given airbases to US only
for logistical purposes and not for attacking Afghanistan. But, everybody knows
that the airbases at Dalbandin and Pasni are actively used by the US forces to
attack Afghanistan.


General Musharraf should look at the history. What happened to his peer General
Zia-ul-Haq? He was a "closest friend" of Washington, he helped them win a war in
Afghanistan, but - he was dumped in a way that he could not even say bye to his
friends. General Musharraf should know that some one in the line of command will
also be getting ready to replace him when the US will complete its real agenda.
Of course US would not like to break up Pakistan or destabilize the region to an
extent where the things would not be under its control any more.

 Wednesday, November 7, 2001


We Bridge the World for You!

© 2000 - 2001 The Balochistan Post. All rights reserved.
Your comments and suggestions are most welcome

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager