On the basis of Richard McCormacks email, I have protested to the DfES, and
asked for an extension to January 7.
Roger Clark
Academic Registrar
University of Reading
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Admin-student [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
> PHILLIPS A.H
> Sent: 03 December 2001 16:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Tuition Fee Position Reports and Attendance Confirmation
> Repo rts
>
>
> Dear Roger,
>
> We have been trying to confirm the dates we would be receiving
> the reports.
> So far the SLC has not responded. Here at Swansea we will be in a similar
> position to Warwick. If we don't get the tuition attendance report soon we
> will not be able to make our return by the 20th December. Perhaps a way
> forward would be to issue the floppy disk immediately and the hard copy
> could be supplied on request or some time later. This method
> would not hold
> up institutions who are able to make the return electronically.
>
> Aled Phillips
> Student Records & Systems Manager
> ACU, Room 5, Singleton Abbey, Swansea, SA2 8PP
> Tel: (01792) (51) 3143
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard McCormack [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 03 December 2001 15:22
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Tuition Fee Position Reports and Attendance
> Confirmation Reports
>
> Dear Roger
>
> I wanted to raise with you the concerns and problems that we are
> having here at Portsmouth in respect of the SLC fee position and
> attendance confirmation report.
>
> The initial date that we were given for the report being run and
> dispatched to HEIs was 23rd November 2001 (due to arrive at HEIs
> wthin 3 days of the run). We have since received notification
> (including the message below) that the date of arrival had been
> extended to 5 days after the run date of 23/11 and then 7 days
> after the run.
>
> As we did not receive the report on Friday 30th November, I phoned
> the DfES to be told that the reports are being run in
> 'alphabetical
> order' by the SLC and that those HEIs later in the alphabet would
> be further delayed! In fact, we might not receive ours until
> Wednesday 5th December - 12 days after the run date. On
> phoning again today, we were told not only were they being ordered
> alphabetically, but institutions with smaller number of students
> were being prioritised!
>
> We have set our timetable, resourcing, and workloads to
> correspond with the published SLC/DfES timescales (as per the
> student support notes) and feel the position we have been
> put in is
> very unfair and unacceptable. We have been told there will be no
> extension to the deadline of return of 20th December 2001
> (obviously those of us in large HEIs in the latter half of the
> alphabet
> are being completely disadvantaged by this). We also have set our
> own internal deadlines for direct debit collection, etc in
> accordance
> with the SLC report timetable and now are being impossibly
> squeezed to meet this timeframe.
>
> If you culd let me have your thoughts on this and whether other
> HEIs are having similiar experiences, it would be mcuh
> appreciated. Also, pressure on the SLC and DfES to extend the
> deadline for return, given the above position, would be
> appreciated.
>
> Many thanks for your help, and any questions please let me know.
>
> Kind Regards
> Richard McCormack
>
> On 28 Nov 01, at 17:14, Roger Clark wrote:
>
> > The DfES has asked me to forward an amendment to the timing of
> Tuition Fee
> > Position Reports and Attendance Confirmation Reports from the
> Student Loans
> > Co
> >
> > Roger Clark
> > Academic Registrar
> > University of Reading
> >
> >
> > Subject: HEICG: SSIN 21/01
> >
> > Dear All
> >
> > Please note that on page 4 of SSIN 21/01 following the table of
> dates for
> > Tuition Fee Position Reports and Attendance Confirmation Reports
> it says
> > 'reports will arrive at institutions within three
> working days of
> run date'.
> > The SLC have indicated that this is not possible due to the
> processing
> > procedures that are gone through following receipt of
> the reports.
> The
> > revised guidance is that reports should be with institutions 7
> days (incl
> > w/ends) after the run date.
> >
> > I would be grateful if you could cascade this information. The
> SLC will
> > also be sending a note through their networks.
> >
> > With thanks.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Yvonne Clarke
>
>
> ----------------------------
> Richard McCormack
> Acting Deputy Academic Registrar
> University of Portsmouth
> Tel: 023 9284 3427
> [log in to unmask]
>
|