??
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
for Goodness sake Anji, take a good look at HyperRESEARCH. It is far
superior to both. It's a LOT mor euser friendly as well. Try Scolari.com.uk
or the simple Scolari.com
> From: Anji <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 15:44:35 -0700
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: My first query: Atlas vs NVivo..any views?
>
> Here goes my first experience of asking for opinion over mailbase....
>
> I am new to the world of qualitative research and I am trying to get some
> information together about which software package might be most useful to
> me in the future for analysis. At the moment I have had suggestions along
> the lines of Atlas (most commonly used in our department) and NVivo (as
> likely to be the package more people will be using in the future).
>
> As I am at the very beginning of a project, and do not have much experience
> of the field yet, I am very open-minded as to what I end up using. I am not
> a complete beginner on computers (have used word processing packages and
> quantitative packages) but I am not very good at tinkering with computer
> packages if things start to go wrong!
>
> My data will probably consist of open-ended interview questions and
> responses to vignettes. The sample will be about 100 people and I will want
> to look especially at the language used when people speak on certain
> subject areas and connections between themes that emerge.
>
> Has anyone any advice on the relative merits of using NVivo over Atlas?
>
> I would be really greatful for any advice on my address below.
>
> Thanks
>
> Anji Wilson
> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> stop
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|