JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-LIRG Archives


LIS-LIRG Archives

LIS-LIRG Archives


LIS-LIRG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-LIRG Home

LIS-LIRG Home

LIS-LIRG  May 2000

LIS-LIRG May 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Library and Information Commission research reports (1 of 2)

From:

[log in to unmask] (Simon Matty)

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask] (Simon Matty)

Date:

Tue, 9 May 2000 15:24:37 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (226 lines)

     **Apologies for cross posting**
     
     List members might like to know that reports based on research funded 
     by the Library and Information Commission are still emerging. Report 
     details will continue to be added to the LIC website until the 
     Resource website goes live. It is therefore worth checking the LIC 
     site periodically for new items.
     
     Listed below are a number of recent reports which I do not think have 
     been announced before. Unless noted otherwise the reports are 
     available for £12.00 from the British Thesis Service, The British 
     Library Document Supply Centre, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire 
     LS23 7BQ tel: +44 (0) 1937 546229 fax: +44 (0)1937 546286 email: 
     [log in to unmask] I have also included in the second 
     message a list of "new" forthcoming titles. 
     
     Simon Matty
     Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries
     
     ---------------------------------------------------------- 
     The value and impact of homework clubs in public libraries 
     by Briony Train.[et al.]
     LIC research report 32
     ISBN 190239416X
     
     This report contains the findings and conclusions of an investigation 
     within the public library service into the value and impact of 
     library-based homework clubs. The authors make recommendations to 
     improve the homework club service which are addressed to the Library 
     Association, public library authorities, library managers and homework 
     club staff. Detailed recommendations for further research are also 
     included. 
     
     ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
     The SAILS Project: a working guide to cross sectoral co-operation, 
     supporting lifelong learning and staff development
     by Lorraine Hall and Sally Curry
     LIC research report 36
     ISBN 1902394194
     
     The SAILS Project is based upon the experience gained in the city of 
     Sunderland in the founding and development of the Libraries Access 
     Sunderland Scheme (LASh) which established cross sectoral co-operation 
     between the City's three major providers of library services in order 
     to provide enhanced support for lifelong learning. The research 
     focuses on three interlinked areas all of which currently have a very 
     high profile in the UK library world: lifelong learning; cross 
     sectoral co-operation and staff training and development. 
     
     The report lists principal barriers to use of libraries by lifelong 
     learners and suggests ways in which library staff can overcome them; 
     highlights the benefits which cross sectoral co-operation can offer 
     both for learners and for the library staff, and lists ten key factors 
     in creating a successful cross sectoral partnership. The Report also 
     demonstrates the value of cross sectoral co-operative staff training 
     and development and provides a guide to key skills needed by staff both 
     for improving the support which libraries can provide for all learners 
     and managing successful cross sectoral cooperation. 
     
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     SEAMLESS: an organisational and technical model for seamless access to 
     distributed citizens' information
     by Mary Rowlatt...[et al.]
     LIC research report 37
     Project pages available on the Internet at: http://www.seamless.org.uk 
     
     The SEAMLESS project developed, tested and evaluated a new model for 
     citizens' information provision. The model is distributed, and based 
     on partnerships and common standards developed by the SEAMLESS Project 
     team and 29 representative organisations including national government 
     departments, County Council departments, District Councils, Health 
     authorities, business organisations, educational establishments, CABS, 
     voluntary and charitable groups. 
     
     The report describes how SEAMLESS has: 
     
     established a working partnership with a variety of organisations 
     built and tested a technical demonstrator 
     proved that the technology works and that the distributed data sets 
     are accessible 
     developed and successfully implemented common standards - the SEAMLESS 
     profile, the thesaurus and the place name control 
     begun to develop a management framework to drive the transition of 
     SEAMLESS from a research project to a fully functioning live system. 
     identified the need for further development work to provide metadata 
     tools and an automated thesaurus and place list 
     
     ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Trend analysis of monograph acquisitions in public and university 
     libraries in the UK
     by Ann Chapman and David Spiller
     LIC research report 47
     ISBN 1901786293
     Available from: Publications Section, LISU, Loughborough University 
     Loughborough LE11 3TU. tel: 01509 223071; fax: 01509 223072; email: 
     [log in to unmask] PRICE £17.50 
     
     This study has identified a number of trends relating to acquisitions 
     and stock management practices. Possible causes have been suggested 
     but more focused work will be needed to come to definite conclusions. 
     In the meantime, the study raises a number of questions for libraries, 
     suppliers, booksellers and publishers. Are public libraries doing too 
     little stock revision? Does supplier selection favour 'newer' titles 
     and those in certain subject areas, such as biographies? Is the 
     increase in paperback purchase by public libraries a result of format 
     availability or is practice simply at variance with stated preference? 
     Are public and academic libraries avoiding purchase of expensive 
     titles, intending to rely on interlending to fulfil demand? Are 
     academic libraries buying too much stock in the social sciences and 
     too little in science, mathematics and technology, in relation to the 
     proportion of students studying these subjects? Is financial pressure 
     delaying the purchase of borderline material the reason for HE 
     libraries acquiring increasing numbers of older titles? It may be 
     useful for libraries to review their acquisitions policy and practices 
     in the light of these findings. 
     
     ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Review of current preservation management training in the UK and 
     abroad
     by Stella Thebridge and Graham Matthews 
     LIC research report 48
     ISBN 1902394240
     
     This six month part-time project investigates preservation management 
     training in libraries, archives and museums. It arose from a growing 
     awareness among preservation specialists and practitioners that 
     training is being carried out in a variety of institutions across a 
     range of sectors, but that there is little co-ordination. It was 
     perceived that a drawing together of these training strands might: 
     
     encourage those who offer training by increasing dissemination of what 
     they can offer 
     provide the impetus to those who wish to develop training initiatives 
     in their own institutions or regions by bringing together information 
     about the full range of resources and activities available. 
     
     The authors conclude that the training in the area of preservation is 
     still principally about awareness rather than management issues. They 
     make recommendations to move training forward which involve the 
     National Preservation Office, the Library Association, the Museums, 
     Libraries and Archives Council and a second phase of the review to 
     build on a draft skills list. 
     
     ---------------------------------------------------- 
     Internet access for older adults in public libraries 
     by Kay Flatten.[et al.]
     LIC research report 50
     ISBN 1902394259
     
     The report of a project in Monmouthshire which used the BBC Webwise 
     campaign, for public awareness of the Internet, to target the older 
     customers of five public libraries. The work highlighted how 
     inexperienced older customers were with all aspects of the web. It 
     also revealed their desire to learn about and use computers. 
     
     ---------------------------------------------------------- 
     Developing a national strategy for preservation surrogates 
     by April Edwards, Graham Matthews, Clare Nankivell
     LIC research report 54
     ISBN 1902394267
     
     The report of a project commissioned by the National Preservation 
     Office and funded by the Library and Information Commission. The 
     project set out to produce a 'snap-shot' of library, archive and 
     museum collections suitable for surrogacy; to categorise collections 
     suitable for preservation surrogacy within a national strategy; to 
     produce an overview of preservation surrogacy options for particular 
     types of collection and preservation surrogacy standards; and, to 
     develop the criteria and methodology for establishing a national 
     strategy for preservation surrogates.
     
     The report includes a Draft Preservation Surrogacy Selection Criteria 
     Checklist which has been developed to facilitate proposals to funders 
     for preservation surrogacy projects and for their selection and 
     prioritisation. Key criteria here are: collection details, risk 
     assessment (including condition, environment and use), value, access, 
     additional benefits of surrogacy, and feasibility of programmes and 
     methods to be employed. Draft Guidance Notes for applicants and 
     funders provide further information on completing the checklist. Other 
     chapters cover preservation surrogacy standards, a discussion of 
     preservation surrogacy options, and an overview of collections 
     suitable for surrogacy and related issues. 
     
     The report suggests how a national strategy for preservation surrogacy 
     may be established around the Preservation Surrogacy Selection 
     Criteria Checklist. Recommendations are made as to how the Checklist 
     needs to be developed to be applied in libraries and tailored to meet 
     the different needs of archives and museums. The establishment of 
     Development Group by the National Preservation Office to move this 
     forward and to develop the strategy in line with other initiatives and 
     developments in digitisation is suggested. 
     
     ---------------------------------------------- 
     Benchmarks in collection care for UK libraries 
     by Nancy Bell and Helen Lindsay
     LIC research report 55
     ISBN 1902394275
     
     This research project has looked at existing schemes that assess 
     collections care in libraries, archives and museums in the United 
     States, Canada, Australia, Italy and the United Kingdom, with a view 
     to identifying and evaluating the key elements in each, and 
     considering their usefulness in designing a scheme for the UK library 
     domain. The findings of this critical review indicated that a system 
     of benchmarks for collections care was the most appropriate scheme. 
     Ten categories, agreed as being key areas of library activity which 
     have an impact on the long-term preservation of collections, have been 
     used as the framework for the benchmark system. They are policy, 
     buildings, storage, housekeeping, handling, environmental monitoring 
     and control, exhibition and loans, conservation, surrogate copies and 
     non-traditional material and disaster preparedness. Levels of 
     performance have been identified for each of these areas, against 
     which performance may be judged in the categories basic, good and best 
     practice. The aim of this benchmarking scheme is 'to help libraries 
     evaluate how well they are caring for their collections and identify 
     areas where improvement might be needed'. The resulting document 
     Benchmarks in collections care for UK libraries consists of a set of 
     clear and realistic benchmarks to help librarians and preservation 
     managers identify the strengths and weaknesses of collections care 
     provision in their libraries. 
     



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager