What if someone experiences an impairment as frustrating? (I don't mean heavy doors or stairs, but things like incontinence or "E.D.," as Bob Dole would say.) Frustrating is not necessarily neutral. Or, on the other hand, someone might experience an impairment as enlightening. (Mood swings can be pretty enlightening.) Which might not be neutral. Someone might experience an impairment as frustrating and enlightening. Claudia
In a message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2000 8:37:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Simon Stevens" <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Hi Paul
>
> I think impairment is the most neutral thing there is. Having blue or brown eyes is a neutral state. Therefore having a slurred speech is similar, it is factual and neither good or bad. In problem is how others relate to this, which creates disability. For myself, my identity as a disabled peope is very different to my identity as a impaired person. While all identity is interlinked, it is separate. I do agree that impairment affects lifestyle and with external pressure, will be socialised with a positive or more likely neutral value. But going back to the issue, impairment is a biological fact and therefore neutral.
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Stevens
> Enable Enterprises
> PO Box 1974, COVENTRY, CV3 1YF
>
> Tel: 070 209 21158 Fax: 0870 133 2447
>
> Personal:
> Email: [log in to unmask] Web: www.simonstevens.com
>
> Business
> Email: [log in to unmask] Web: www.enableenterprisescom
>
> Join our free mailing list at
> [log in to unmask] <---CLICK HERE
> and keep in touch with the latest in accessibility issues PLUS free price draw every month! Win £150 worth of consultancy
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|