The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  April 2000

DISABILITY-RESEARCH April 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: social model and cognitive impairment

From:

"Linda M. Long" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 11:14:35 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (122 lines)

Hi there.  You may be interested to know that there is a new
philosopy/trend in the U.S. for people with intellectual disabilites that
is called "self-determination".  Alot of the work is being funded by the
Robert Wood Johsnon Foundation, a major philanthropic organization which
generally focuses on health care and long term care issues here in the
U.S.

To find out more, you can go to the following website:

http://iod.unh.edu/projects/selfdet.htm


Ria Strong wrote:

> Anna wrote:
>
> << I am an honours student and my thesis is about the theoretical
> barriers and possibilities of widening service approaches for people
> with an intellectual disability. It discusses the contrast between
> discourses of congitive impairment, the social model and social
> exclusion models. >>
>
> [snip]
>
> << I am particularly interested to discuss the nature of agency in the
> social model (or critical theory) with consideration to the issues
> that face people with cognitive impairment. The sociological concept
> of 'agency' refers to the assumption that people are reflective and
> capable of choice and action (Barnes, Mercer & Shakespeare, 1999).
> This term is meshed with the notion of rationality, which is in simple
> terms the ability to use reason. >>
>
> [snip]
>
> << So critical theory and the social model upholds the importance of
> reason, and therefore the subjugation of the body to the mind which
> marks out people with a cognitive impairment in the first place. >>
>
> I spent a long time trying to understand what Anna was saying. Now, I
> *think* I've got most of it.
>
> Agency = the ability to make choices, and control your life. What many
> of us would call "self-determination".
>
> Many people think those of us with cognitive disabilities can't be
> self-determining-- that our disability itself prevents this. The major
> barrier to our ability to make "good" choices is seen to be our
> disability itself-- not the sort of societal barriers faced by people
> with physical or sensory disabilities.
>
> Have I understood that correctly? If so, I have some comments :)
>
> 1. People with cognitive disabilities *can* make choices. With
> appropriate support, many of us can self-determine in most, or all,
> areas of our lives. And even the most severely disabled amongst us can
> indicate (say) likes and dislikes-- through facial expressions, for
> example.
>
> 2. Many people with cognitive disabilities aren't *given the chance*
> to self-determine-- except in very limited areas of our lives. People
> make choices for us, decide what they think is best for us.
>
> 3. Some people with cognitive disabilities have *never learned* to
> self-determine-- because they've never been in a situation where this
> was encouraged. People living in institutions have very, very limited
> choices available to them-- so people leave institutions ill-equipped
> to make them. That doesn't mean they *can't* learn to make choices,
> and be self-determining-- only that they haven't done so yet.
>
> 4. People with cognitive disabilities *do* encounter societal
> barriers-- barriers that limit our ability to self-determine. Jargon
> is a barrier. Complex language is a barrier. Lack of information is a
> barrier. People's assumptions (the assumption that we can't make good
> choices, for example)-- they're a barrier.
>
> 5. The important question: "What can be done to help people with
> cognitive disabilities self-determine?" Not "why can't they?", but
> "what will make it (more) possible?"
>
> 6. I recently heard a self-advocate say: "Everybody talks about ramps
> to buildings. What about ramps to minds?" "Ramps to minds"-- I thought
> it was a wonderful phrase. Plain English can be a "ramp". Audio tapes
> can be a "ramp". Pictures and video can be "ramps".
>
> 7. Lastly, a story. Friends of mine used to support a self-advocacy
> group within a large institution. When the institution was going to
> close, Jacqui and Sue worked very, very hard to give all the residents
> info about the closure. They also helped everyone choose where they
> wanted to live. They used video, and lots of pictures. They asked
> people how they felt about leaving-- happy or sad (they had pictures
> of happy and sad faces for people to choose from). They told people
> some of the other places they might be able to live-- a house, another
> institution, or... (they didn't assume that people knew what choices
> were available). They asked where (geographically) people wanted to
> live-- near their family, with friends from the institution, or...
> (again, they didn't assume people knew what choices were available).
> The whole process took *months*-- but by the end of it, everyone
> living in that institution knew what was happening. And everyone had
> decided where they wanted to live. Of course-- people's choices were
> often ignored :(:(  Staff decided for people, or families did. In the
> end, policy issues and numbers ruled (120 people were going to live in
> a new institution, built on the site of the old one-- regardless of
> their wants and needs...). Yes, many of the people living in that
> institution had severe cognitive disabilities. Even so, they *were*
> able to self-determine-- if/when others *let* them, and provided the
> support (the "ramps to minds") they needed.
>
> - Ria
>
> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>          Ria Strong
>      Melbourne, Australia
> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>    [log in to unmask]
> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager