JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SIMSOC Archives


SIMSOC Archives

SIMSOC Archives


SIMSOC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SIMSOC Home

SIMSOC Home

SIMSOC  2000

SIMSOC 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

abss or ace: humbug production function

From:

Scott Moss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Scott Moss <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:30:44 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (125 lines)

In this email, I respond specifically to Chris Auld's claim that I was
misleading in my presentation of the humbug production function and
Solow's response.  The issues involved are actually of considerable
social importance since Solow's technique is a key element in
computational economic models used to inform policy discussions about
dealing with green house gas emissions, their effects on climate and
such measures as carbon taxes to limit humanity's effects on the
climate.  The same technique is the basis of standard economic
contributions to policy analysis relating to education.  I think it is
important to realise that these issues -- and my polemic -- are not just
of academic interest.

 The relevant passage from Auld's message is:

> The central issue revolves around a critique of Solow published in
> 1974 by
> Shaikh.  Moss tells his readers that Shaikh's critique demolishes
> Solow's
> technique, a result Solow himself "accepted in substance" and which
> has
> "never been successfully refuted."  Moss proceeds to provide citation
> counts
> showing that Solow is still oft cited whereas Shaikh is largely
> ignored,
> allegedly demonstrating economists ignore criticism which undermines
> accepted
> methods.  In reality, Solow provided an absolutely devastating reply
> to
> Shaikh

What I actually wrote was:

     The conclusion is inescapable: Solow’s technique for
     distinguishing between the effects of technical change and the
     effects of capital investment does no such thing. At best, it
     provides a complicated measure for the constancy of income
     distribution.... It is safe to say that the critique, accepted
     in substance by Solow and never successfully refuted, has not
     prevented the paper and the technique from remaining hugely
     influential.

What Solow wrote was:

     Mr. Shaikh's article is based on misconception pure and
     simple.  The factor-share device of my 1957 article is in no
     sense at _test_ of aggregate production functions of marginal
     productivity or anything else.  It merely shows how one goes
     about interpreting given time series if one starts by
     _assuming_ that they were generated from a production function
     and the competitive marginal-productivity relations apply.
     Therefore, it is not only not surprising but it is exactly the
     point that if the observed factor shares were exactly
     constant, the method would yield an exact Cobb-Douglas and
     tuck everything else into the shift factor.  That is what one
     would _want_ such a method to do.

For those not trained in economics, factor shares are the shares of
income paid as wages and as profits.

I take it that the substance of Shaikh's article was that the goodness
of fit of the Cobb-Douglas production function using Solow's technique
depends entirely on the constancy of these factor shares.  My reading of
the quoted paragraph above and the rest of Solow's reply to Shaikh is
that he accepts that point (how could he not?) but denies that it should
influence what economists do.  Why should anyone care "how one goes
about interpreting given time series if one starts by assuming ..."?
Why should "one start by assuming" that the data was "generated from a
production function and competitive marginal-productivity relations"?
Suppose, indeed, that we ask whether any data can ever be generated by
"a production function and marginal producitivy relations".

The answer can be found in a literature that Solow knew well and was
surveyed by Geoff Harcourt in the June, 1969 issue of the Journal of
Economic Literature.  The answer is that data is consistent with "a
production function and competitive marginal-productivity relations" in
two and only two cases:

     Case 1:  The economy has been in a steady growth equilibrium
     since before the oldest capital equipment was produced and the
     steady growth rate is exactly equal to the prevailing, common
     rate of profits on the value of all existing capital
     equipment.  That steady rate of growth and that common rate of
     profits must also be expected with complete confidence to
     continue to prevail for the lifetime of all existing capital
     equipment.

     Case 2:  The economy produces one good.  That good and labour
     are used to produce the good.  The good can be costlessly
     changed to equip any larger or smaller number of workers.  Any
     excess of the good can be scrapped costlessly.  This good is
     also the only good consumed by households.

That Chris Auld finds Solow's reply to Shaikh "absolutely devastating"
tells us a great deal about the social structures of the economics
community.  Even if he did not know about the production function
literature surveyed by Harcourt, what reasonable scientist would
consider it good science to make an arbitrary and patently false set of
assumptions to devise a technique for the specification of policies
intended to protect the planet and appropriately to educate our
children?

I repeat my charge: economics (if science it be) is both bad science and
intellectually dishonest.



--
Professor Scott Moss
Director
Centre for Policy Modelling
Manchester Metropolitan University
Aytoun Building
Manchester M1 3GH
UNITED KINGDOM

telephone: +44 (0)161 247 3886
fax: +44 (0)161 247 6802

http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/~scott




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager